salvar

8 ms·

1.
by salvar 8y ago
Excellent, what are the metrics then? What makes a "how to do your nails" tutorial brainless stupidity?
2.
by salvar 8y ago
Who decides what is valuable content and what is brainless stupidity?
3.
by salvar 8y ago
> I'm not sure what more they could do. They're extremely pushy about it in Windows. One of the things that pushed me away from Edge. Being pushy is not the same as being persuasive.
4.
by salvar 8y ago
Where can you get them for $2.65? I've never even seen one for sale.
5.
by salvar 8y ago
Of course it has lots to do with Microsoft's fuckery. I don't think it's a binary choice. Can you answer my question now? Edit: Sorry, misread the author. Thought you were the same as I asked the original question. Nevermind
6.
by salvar 8y ago
Is there any point? It seems like you're convinced enough that nothing can ever change your mind. So I'm fine with just disagreeing and leaving it at that.
7.
by salvar 8y ago
I'm sorry if I come across as obtuse, but I just need to understand this clearly. Is it your belief that the low usage of Linux has nothing to do with Linux itself?
8.
by salvar 8y ago
Just because something is revenue doesn't mean that the purpose is entirely to increase revenue. That is the claim you made. I have presented a counter-example to that, where revenue increase is clearly not the only reason for monetary
9.
by salvar 8y ago
I'll have to disagree with that. Linux has significant usability problems, and pretending that it has none is not going to help anyone.
10.
by salvar 8y ago
Yes, I really do. Why don't more computers come with Linux pre-installed? If Linux is such a great replacement for Windows, why has it made very little gains in replacing Windows? Is it all somebody else's fault and has nothing to
11.
by salvar 8y ago
Anecdote of my own: In my country, monetary fines in traffic infringements are explicitly not for revenue. They mix into the total state revenue and form a minuscule fraction of it. The police sees none of it. This distinction is made very
12.
by salvar 8y ago
That's quite the brush you're painting with there. Is the primary motivation behind fining the same everywhere?
13.
by salvar 8y ago
So why isn't everyone using it then?
14.
Tesla Model 3 is starting to show some important flaws in cold weather(electrek.co)
2 points by salvar 8y ago|0 comments
15.
by salvar 8y ago
Fair enough. I'll amend it to "All Reddit, HN and Twitter apps I have ever seen"
16.
by salvar 8y ago
I guess... but that still leaves pretty much all news aggregators. Google News doesn't let you do much other than read news from all over the internet. It's functionally exactly the same, only with a different aggregating algorith
17.
by salvar 8y ago
This seems weird enough to be an error of some kind. Not that Apple is likely to fix it, but enforcing this rule would exclude: - All Reddit apps - All HN apps - Twitter - Facebook - Google News - Any link or news aggregator I guess even a
18.
by salvar 8y ago
Doesn't this exist already? Fire up TOR, brave the wilderness of hidden services.
19.
by salvar 8y ago
I'm still not exactly sure, which is definitely a red flag to me since I'm already a nerdy type that should at least understand the value proposition.
20.
by salvar 8y ago
Have you done any research into how likely it is that a visitor from your demographic understands what "federated" means in this context? I ask because it's part of the tagline, so if you don't understand a key word in t
21.
by salvar 8y ago
I didn't see anything in the tweetstorm indicating that this only took a day for Mr. Wallace. Do you have a link to where you got that impression?
22.
by salvar 8y ago
Counterpoint to your ridiculous hyperbole: Why isn't the murder rate near zero in states with the death penalty?
23.
by salvar 8y ago
It can definitely indicate a major problem beyond that of voting. But what does that have to do with voting? Should they have a harder time voting because they already have other major problems anyway?
24.
by salvar 8y ago
All right then, can you name an example where this news organization (Center for Investigative Reporting) has misled readers to make them believe the wrong things?
25.
by salvar 8y ago
Submitting to the (future) status quo is very different from saying "I support whatever the outcome is" though. Unless you mean "support" as in "I will respect whatever happens", in which case I agree. But that
26.
by salvar 8y ago
> Some people say that if you voted or not is public record. Yes it is public but there is a difference between 1 click and jumping through some bureaucracy to find that information. Would you call that bureaucracy an important feature t
27.
by salvar 8y ago
And as soon as any of these individuals came in to vote and saw that someone had already voted fraudulently on their behalf, an investigation would start. And you'd get maybe what, three or four votes in exchange for the very real poss
28.
by salvar 8y ago
Probably. But does that justify making it more difficult for them to vote?
29.
by salvar 8y ago
If it's a company safe? Well of course that's the employer's decision. A better example would be a safe deposit box or storage unit with a combination. Where you are accessing your account so to speak. There you can pick the
30.
by salvar 8y ago
> Also improves conversion rate since there's no risk the user gives up signing up because he can't be bothered to think about or generate a password. Sure, but there's considerable risk of the user giving up signing up be

More ›