Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saithir
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
saithir
2mo ago
Guess you have never used norton/windows/midnight commander either?
2.
▲
by
saithir
6mo ago
Extending one organization's results to saying "completely unenforced" is definitely something, considering the ~billion of fines per year.
3.
▲
by
saithir
6mo ago
> announce « The most secure Mac ever » silently releasing with closed bootloader Is that gonna be before or after the iphone with no usb port?
4.
▲
by
saithir
6mo ago
It's really a wonder how every time gdpr is even remotely related, there's always gotta be someone complaining about how gdpr is at fault for the cookie/data prompts, and never that sites and advertising companies (and their
5.
▲
by
saithir
6mo ago
The brick itself? Probably not gonna happen anytime fast, cause that's a custom chip in there and it doesn't have easy connections to the outside world. But the interesting part will be in scanning multiple tiles/minifigures
6.
▲
by
saithir
7mo ago
I just don't find remembering an exact list of all of them a worthy information to keep in my brain. Maybe if I had a dozen, but between me and my wife we do read much more than that. I also don't remember all of the contents of m
7.
▲
by
saithir
7mo ago
Sometimes we definitely want 'items' though, so for example I am in a physical bookstore and see a book I might be interested in, so I buy it, to find out later back home that I already have the very same book - and edition - alre
8.
▲
by
saithir
7mo ago
But that would require directing the anger at specific companies (and their 2137 ad partners) rather than at an easy target of the banana-regulating evil authority. Sadly whenever this kind of discussion pops up it's usually a very unp
9.
▲
by
saithir
7mo ago
> Available offers > Get offers for top games with Play Pass > 50% zniżki na zakup w aplikacji > Do 37 zł zniżki co tydzień > Candy Crush Soda Saga Yeah, I would say a big ad for a game that is literally THE textbook
10.
▲
by
saithir
7mo ago
It's also super easy not to use hard drugs, yet that's not a reason to stop restricting them. If something's harmful it should be controlled.
11.
▲
by
saithir
9mo ago
I think people like to imagine it's not viable because the most commonly known adblocker refuses to release the version for it. Negative news somehow stick better. Fortunately it's not the only one and for example Adguard works pe
12.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
That sounds like the buyer's problem though.
13.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
Because unlike the authors of this set - who went and stripped the posts out of usernames and permalinks to anonymize it - that set you mention just grabbed data out of the API as-is (at least based on its huggingface description that'
14.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
Or, "How To Get Some Public Appreciation With Minimal Effort: An Attempt". If they actually cared they'd host (and more importantly, supported since they probably don't run on modern systems without some fiddling) those
15.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
Because the article from August 2024 is still correct. In 15.1 you can still go to the system settings/privacy and click the "open anyway" button for the application there and it will still launch. Source: I am on 15.1 and ju
16.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
There's also a Dorian Kucharski '); DROP TABLE users;-- and two more examples of a bit more failed (or maybe those two are the ones that chickened out) attempts when you search ceidg for "DROP TABLE". I am a bit proud.
17.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
That's a separate option. The option above head tracking in those settings allows for adding your facial expressions (smiling, blinking etc) as shortcuts for clicks.
18.
▲
by
saithir
2y ago
> Your current browser is not supported, please switch to Chrome Browser and try again Oh hey I remember these popups from somewhere...
19.
▲
by
saithir
3y ago
We'll stop being sure when the ratio of ad revenue to hardware sales flips completely, yes.
20.
▲
by
saithir
4y ago
> have a clear "Getty Images" copyright watermark If they had clearly copied Getty Images watermarks, sure... The problem is, they don't.
21.
▲
by
saithir
4y ago
That's only for the 4-man dungeons. You still need to run the Crystal Tower raid, for example.
22.
▲
by
saithir
4y ago
Even ignoring the patches after the gaps, that's still 1998 to 2009 and 2003 to 2011, so both much larger time spans than the parent poster's claim that nobody ever does that.
23.
▲
by
saithir
4y ago
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft/Patches Yep, nothing to see here, no regular, ongoing support to a 20 year old game of the non-subscription variety at all. Warcraft 3 (from 2003) was similarly updated well into 2019.
24.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
> typing into the search bar is laggy and I on a daily basis arrow down to select a previously used URL, hit enter, and then find that Safari moved my selection up or down I had this. It went away when I stopped using the tab groups. It&
25.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
For extra pain, you can go at the text above with your browser's devtools and change the font-family to something funny like Comic Sans MS. Turns out text rendering _really_ does hate you.
26.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
Much like the few US-based news sites that already decided to just not bother and show me the "you're coming from the EU and we can't be bothered to not collect your data" blank page instead. At which point I'm free
27.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
The catapult still invokes visions of "throwing shit at the wall until something sticks", so it is still not the worst name :)
28.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
So it's the regular smart TV just its smartness - any any useful ports you'd want from a TV - comes in two parts? I'm not sure that's what the parent commenter was asking for.
29.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
You can't though, can you? You need at least 3 for the first one - 1 to get the info on the murder which is just text, 2nd to get the interviews (which aren't connected to the murder info, though they probably should), and then yo
30.
▲
by
saithir
5y ago
Feels super ironic you choose to describe Apple users as a "cult" in a reply to a guy that sneaks his "Safari is the new IE5" in every response... ;)
More ›