saikia81

6 ms·

1.
by saikia81 5mo ago
Your point doesn't come across here? And doesn't seem to have any direct reactions to the comment above. Any proof or source for your claims would help. Also no reason to be rude.
2.
by saikia81 6mo ago
have you read the dev mailing list? There the developers of python discuss lots.
3.
by saikia81 7mo ago
I'm guessing you missed out on the Snowden revelations? Or the news articles about federal agents literally laughing at private dick pics. And your second paragraph seems to go on the premise that the average person care if there is a
4.
by saikia81 7mo ago
because the tech is hard to envision right (or sci-fi writers would be rich), but the consequences are clearer
5.
by saikia81 7mo ago
In the united states the first amendment of the constitution makes it so that any public usage of camera tech cannot be controlled by the state. Except in some very specific scenarios.
6.
by saikia81 7mo ago
The fact that every new technology has had pushback before adoption makes your claim meaningless.
7.
by saikia81 7mo ago
And nobody should go hungry, and nobody should lack basic healthcare. But here we are balancing the scales.
8.
by saikia81 8mo ago
If I understand you. This goes with the presupposition that crypto will replace the bank and its features exactly. You might then be right on the convergences. But sounds like a failure to understand that crypto is not a traditional bank. I
9.
by saikia81 8mo ago
That is only bitcoin. There are coins and protocols where transactions are instant
10.
by saikia81 8mo ago
calling the llm model random is inaccurate
11.
by saikia81 8mo ago
I'm guessing you believe that a person is always completely responsible for their actions. If you are doing root cause analysis you will get nowhere with that attitude.
12.
by saikia81 8mo ago
They made oauth client (cognito oauth credential grant) a subscription, raising our bill X10. Just for having the client registered in the dashboard, even without using that oauth client application. we saw thousands of cost, for zero usage
13.
by saikia81 9mo ago
the best thing that you can do for yourself maybe, but not for them...
14.
by saikia81 9mo ago
good question. After reading his passionate plea for the immigrants, anyone would ask your question.
15.
by saikia81 9mo ago
Most companies have more than enough of those, and these problems are already solved every day. In the end everything is vulnerable and the internet is dangerous, a vibe coder is no more dangerous than an average junior software engineer.
16.
by saikia81 9mo ago
The fact you want to keep the current distribution, without considering that it could help many people if changed is a bit ignorant. Just because (without any indication why) you feel that the ones in control are doing well. I'm not se
17.
by saikia81 9mo ago
you are right, but the inverse doesn't have to be. There is a factor that could make the work so cheap, that people don't care about the quality anymore.
18.
by saikia81 10mo ago
Have you considered the AI is right, and you make the mistakes?
19.
by saikia81 10mo ago
Thank god. The fake search results, the money that manipulates our access to information. all gone. Finally we can try something else. I have a feeling it's going to be worse though.
20.
by saikia81 10mo ago
It is a question in philosophy. It is the difference between being considered a conscious being, and not. Since for now our definitions of a conscious being is tied to being alive (when is a human alive and not death?). So obviously it has
21.
by saikia81 10mo ago
yeah, but he was biased against humans because of their smell. Though a virus might not be accurate.
22.
by saikia81 10mo ago
The project isn't about research it's about creating a reference implementation
23.
by saikia81 1y ago
stop smoking it then?
24.
by saikia81 2y ago
in the Netherlands the state managed housing is the best. While private renters skirt their responsibilities, and enforcing a contractual is hard.
25.
by saikia81 2y ago
I have no ball in this game, as I am non-US. but sounds like the same can be said. Just wait until the FBI starts harassing your family outside their lawful jurisdiction. Or an FBI agent abusing their family. But at least your children will
26.
by saikia81 2y ago
Being this judgemental is sad. But as you said it reflects on your ability to square his decisions with the situation.
27.
by saikia81 2y ago
It seems you contradict yourself. Yes change is Trump's platform. But you agree he won't change anything. So the system has the illusion of change, but no proof it can actually facilitate it.
28.
by saikia81 2y ago
Reminder that slavery is not banned in case you have comitted a crime in the US. See the constitution.
29.
by saikia81 2y ago
And what if the system doesn't work? Your argument has the presupposition that the political system is a working democracy. Stability, and security are not a given for all.
30.
by saikia81 2y ago
I think commenters are being critical of the hierarchycal system with so many levels. It really differs per country.

More ›