saddlepaddle

5 ms·

1.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
We have a concept of setup and teardown scripts if you're interested in checking them out! Together with worktrees, you can make it pretty automatic to making copies of your repo: https://docs.superset.sh/setup-teardown
2.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
Ah unfortunately not through the hosted product, but if you fork and build it you should be able to skip the sign-in
3.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
Fair pushback! The space will settle down eventually, it's just clear to a lot of people that there's a lot of value to be created in this space that hasn't been created yet :)
4.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
That's an interesting take! Basically Linux / a computer is everything you need to ship code. If I could provide one gentle pushback - the same way there's utility in OMZ, lazyvim etc., there may be utility in us shipping our
5.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
So we also ship a cloud service along with Superset, which enables our Linear integration, Slack integration, and our multiplayer capabilities / remote workspaces. When you sign in, you're signing into our cloud service!
6.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
So far we've been growing pretty healthily all things considered! I think one thing to remember is that the other side of us having dozens of competitors is that if the space couldn't sustain more than 1-2 parallel agent companies
7.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
Actually Cursor is starting to converge with us as we speak! You can look at their new agents mode (which is now their default for new users) as an example. For what happens, in our heads the end goal is building a software factory where do
8.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
On the docket! Right now the main thing we have enabled is the file system + terminals + ai agents through remote workspaces, but yes dev environments is definitely on the agenda :)
9.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
Ah actually we're unaffiliated!
10.
by saddlepaddle 4mo ago
That's fair! We do have more paid features (a slack integration, remote workspaces etc.) but yeah we haven't found the best balance for which tier to put each in for sure.
11.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
True yeah that would be a good feature! We took a peek at it in the past and it's not too bad, no promises on when it'll ship though
12.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Yeah we have friends that have done the same! Definitely quick to build a custom CLI if you're willing to roll up your sleeves. I do tend to like the niceties of our GUI tho, if you get a chance to compare your cli / our GUI would
13.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
No you're good, it's fair feedback! I think a fair description of where we're at is "if you use a cli agent for 90+% of your work, this is a drop-in terminal replacement that'll make it easier for you to run them in
14.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
YES their project is great, there's a lot in the planning space that would be extremely useful (grabbing your Circleback notes -> creating tickets, having playbooks like Devin in ticket form so you can choose what to build first, et
15.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Yep, there's a set of tasks I never have to babysit anymore and it's very freeing. Our desktop builds are 15m sometimes, and instead of checking it and waiting I have Claude watch the job, download the build from GitHub when it&#x
16.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Awesome that sounds really cool! Yeah we have some friends that found a lot of luck with just a custom cli (something Avi did some tests with too), it definitely is a viable approach to use :)
17.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Thanks for the offer! We'd be open to chatting, want to ping us on our discord?
18.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
LOL it definitely can get a little trippy but it's pretty doable! I can't get to 10 regularly but the space is moving in that direction (more agents in parallel hopefully equals more work done). I liked this video a lot for a gene
19.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Hmm I guess two good questions to check to see if this tool is useful for you is 1) do you use a cli coding agent for the vast majority of your work and 2) are you interested in using more than one at once? If those two assumptions are true
20.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Hmm probably out of scope unfortunately as it's a pretty high maintenance burden to support (hg share is not 1:1 with git worktrees), it's possible our sandbox offering may work out-of-box for hg as we'll probably just clone
21.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
We have the BringYourOwnAgent part! For sandboxes we may try to use just one provider if I had to guess as I'm not sure what the effort would look like to support a bunch of them, which provider do you use for your VM's?
22.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Thanks, glad to hear it! Let us know if you have any feedback :)
23.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Yep, for now that's how we do it! We're looking into remote sandboxes and tunneling soon though :)
24.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Interesting, I'd love to hear more about this! Were you/they experiencing performance bottlenecks with xterm?
25.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Thanks, Catnip looks pretty cool! Honestly it's pretty similar, I think ours is a bit more lightweight (it seems they have remote sandboxes where they host their code whereas we host your code locally using git worktrees). The mobile a
26.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
LOL yeah I agree, we're definitely building in a crowded space. I am very hopeful though for the amount of utility that'll be made in the agent orchestration space though! There's a lot that can be built if we successfully ma
27.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Yeah we're looking into ways to give users access to these tools in Superset too! And yeah the next frontier is definitely offloading to agents in sandboxes, Kiet has that as one of his top priorities.
28.
by saddlepaddle 9mo ago
Hey there, I'm another member of the superset team! I think it's definitely something you have to get used to, and it is somewhat task dependent. For bug fixes and quick changes I can definitely get to 5-7 in parallel, but for rea