saadn92

9 ms·

1.
by saadn92 2mo ago
Pretty cool - I’ve also been doing something along the lines of this with lumifyhub but it includes docs and boards natively
2.
by saadn92 2mo ago
ouch, probably going to be some time to get it back up since it can't debug itself now
3.
by saadn92 2mo ago
Exactly, it just comes down to do you really care about what you’re writing about? If you’re using AI, most likely not. Thanks for chiming in
4.
by saadn92 2mo ago
we have a lot of upper management using AI to write their messages now and it's pretty obvious. not sure how I feel about it.
5.
by saadn92 3mo ago
You think you're learning things at a pace you never imagined, but all you're really doing is learning superficially. You never really go deep into things, and it "seems" like you're learning faster, but how much ca
6.
by saadn92 3mo ago
If it sounds too good to be true, then it usually is.
7.
by saadn92 3mo ago
there's someone already doing this: https://github.com/malisper/pgrust
8.
by saadn92 3mo ago
How do you use AI on a daily basis, and are there times when you don't?
9.
by saadn92 3mo ago
It’s hilarious to me that when you stop investing in juniors and seniors who use your AIs retire, what are they going to do then?
10.
by saadn92 3mo ago
I made a streak/goal tracker that tracks the things I want to work on like being more grateful, working out more, and learning.
11.
by saadn92 3mo ago
yep, even people I thought educated voted for this fool. seriously, they have college degrees, but apparently get their news from random social media accounts
12.
by saadn92 3mo ago
We should be able to do something around this problem. I don't know myself, but I know there's a lot of smart people on this site and if we all came together to work on something, surely there could be something we can do for this
13.
by saadn92 3mo ago
I use claude code on a daily basis, but honestly it becomes more annoying the more I use it. Why? I think because I ask it to do something and unless I'm extremely specific, either the code is verbose or the feature I'm designing
14.
by saadn92 3mo ago
I disagree. There's cases where girls do better and cases where boys do better. This blanket statement is just as bad as saying that all men/boys are smarter than girls.
15.
by saadn92 3mo ago
Bugs did exist, but bugs that come from AI generated code can be easily avoided if a good enough engineer designed it. Also, the rate at which AI generates code means that there's A LOT more bugs now than there used to be.
16.
by saadn92 3mo ago
I read most of the article and came to the conclusion that if what they're describing is so revolutionary, then why do they still need to hire people? Why not just have these systems take full control?
17.
by saadn92 4mo ago
Well, whether it’s a good piece or not is a different story, but I guess for me it makes me think at least time was spent on it, rather than most AI slop I see nowadays, but who knows, I can be wrong.
18.
by saadn92 4mo ago
I personally don’t enjoy it. I want to read another human’s thoughts even if it’s filled with mistakes, because at least it’s not fake.
19.
by saadn92 4mo ago
exactly! after a certain time, you get to a new normal and you want something new or better in life. nothing wrong with that though.
20.
by saadn92 4mo ago
It comes down to perspective tbh. For someone who's worked hard labor throughout their life, the cushy tech job you get is actually worth doing forever. But for people who have never experienced that, I can see why retiring early makes
21.
by saadn92 4mo ago
my guess is: the ENGINEERING problems they solve are harder, but they're still just video games at the end of the day, compared to something that solves an actual business need.
22.
by saadn92 5mo ago
People also used to say that Google or calculators will make you dumber. Neither happened. Won't happen with this either.
23.
by saadn92 5mo ago
Nothing stupid about caring deeply about tools that shaped your career. GitHub wasn't just a SaaS for a lot of us it was where we learned to build. The fact that you're emotional about it says more about how much you gave to that
24.
by saadn92 5mo ago
I agree with this sentiment, because the person directing the agent can still direct it in a way where it'll produce a better or worse output than another person directing it.
25.
by saadn92 5mo ago
What gets me is the craft point. I've shipped more useful software in the last year than probably the previous five combined, and most of that is because I stopped treating code as the artifact and started treating the product as the a
26.
by saadn92 5mo ago
ha, github is down too
27.
by saadn92 5mo ago
The irony runs deeper than the free analysis offer. The whole Mercor contractor relationship was this exact pattern: hand over studio-quality voice recordings and ID scans to get paid for data labeling work that didn't require either.
28.
by saadn92 5mo ago
That's a pretty good swap if you're Microsoft. Exclusivity was already unenforceable in practice, and they were going to have to either sue their biggest AI partner or let it slide. Instead they got the agi escape hatch closed and
29.
by saadn92 5mo ago
[flagged]
30.
by saadn92 5mo ago
Hard disagree. I feel like I'm thinking a lot more now because I have so many parallel projects going on at the same time. AI has allowed me to really, truly create in a way that I've never done before. Yes, my coding skills proba

More ›