s3tz

8 ms·

1.
Unicode Cyrillic Letter Multiocular O(en.wikipedia.org)
10 points by s3tz 3mo ago|2 comments
2.
by s3tz 3mo ago
Multiocular O (ꙮ) is a unique glyph variant found in a single 15th-century manuscript (thereby a hapax legomenon), in the Old Church Slavonic phrase серафими многоꙮчитїи (abbreviated мн̑оꙮ҆читїи̑; serafimi mnogoočitii, 'many-eyed serap
3.
by s3tz 4y ago
Robert Sopolsky's Behavioral Biology at Stanford https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D Absolutely brilliant and engaging explanations of some difficult to understand topics. Especially lesson 22 on E
4.
by s3tz 4y ago
If the law is nonsense then breaking the law is a very good use case.
5.
by s3tz 4y ago
Would help to have an easy toggle between the different ones.
6.
by s3tz 4y ago
What engineers mean by debt toughly falls into two buckets. The first is actual debt, coding done on borrowed time, either consciously or unconsciously. The second is when a lack of experience, knowledge, laziness or other bad habits cause
7.
by s3tz 4y ago
True, but why do people think they need validation to collaborate?
8.
by s3tz 4y ago
At the end of the day, it's either proof of work or proof of force. You can't have a good society build on force, implicit or explicit. In a perfect world we could go with proof of stake, but the world is what it is.
9.
by s3tz 4y ago
All this causes is a massive amount of busywork just to have a shot at maintaining the value of your previous work. This is not necessary for a good economy, not to mention all the externalities it creates.
10.
by s3tz 5y ago
Don't want to sound mean or anything, but you should read more in depth on these "nation" states before taking that position.
11.
by s3tz 5y ago
To me it seems like we haven't reinvented the same thing, but semi-adapted an existing process of communication to the technology available. It's almost like emoji's are the next step of pictograms, however they're mostl
12.
by s3tz 5y ago
With companies like that, at the end of the day they only really answer to shareholders so every problem is a nail.
13.
by s3tz 5y ago
Some quick advice, move from FOMO (fear of missing out) to JOMO (joy of missing out).
14.
by s3tz 5y ago
Seems like it's a crypto secret society.
15.
by s3tz 5y ago
Not exactly, it's a service with unpredictable output. This isn't like a knife where you know what will happen depending on how you use it.
16.
by s3tz 5y ago
CDPR doesn't iterate and test their code in the optimal way. Most of the time they just go at it full on and patch things up at the end. This was (un)fortunately for them a project where the complexity rose so high that their approach
17.
by s3tz 5y ago
That's because everyone fell for the systems fallacy. Blockchain was designed for bitcoin to function, for that purpose alone. Then because it worked for that one use case of a decentralized storage/transfer of value, people assum
18.
by s3tz 5y ago
Depends on what you mean by bad. And which era of Soviet architecture. The block flats look like prisons and feel like the budget ran out 1/3 of the way building them. The early stuff looks excellent, at least the well built parts. The
19.
by s3tz 5y ago
Full transparency of how the system classifies a given person, person is fully annonymous and it's based on reputation alone. Then let ME decide the parameters of what I want to see. Treat it like a decision support system for content.
20.
by s3tz 5y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20201109014700/https://www.chron... Recommend to quickly switch to reader view since after a while, even on wayback, it puts up a popup.
21.
by s3tz 5y ago
The way I see it it's like building a house or buying one. People should do what they want. I'd like more of us to build our houses, but to each his own.
22.
by s3tz 5y ago
I think the proliferation of it made people aware and learn quickly to proceed with caution on many fronts.
23.
by s3tz 5y ago
Can anyone offer a mirror?
24.
by s3tz 5y ago
Fine, but at least make it consistent then. GitHub uses "main" and now this uses "primary", next someone will use "base" and I'm not sure at all how this is better in any way.
25.
by s3tz 5y ago
I can do the same thing on linux and macos without the app being an ad.
26.
by s3tz 5y ago
This is implying that externalities of bad government policies (ie encouraging high home owner rates) weren't the main cause of the market needing a bail out.
27.
by s3tz 5y ago
I think these experiments should use a better name if that's the case, ie limited basic income.
28.
by s3tz 5y ago
It seems like many politicians have a very emotional reaction to these kinds to experiments, seemingly afraid that the results will contradict their beliefs or that they'll somehow be at a loss. And it's not just one or the other
29.
by s3tz 5y ago
I'm curious, can we determine from small scale tests like this whether the data we get from them is scale independent?
30.
by s3tz 5y ago
Is it measured the same way though?

More ›