s1dechnl

8 ms·

1.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Indeed, no one with a mind capable of grasping the foundations of AGI would take such an intellectually incompatible step of publishing the full details of how to construct it. Such an unaware mind would simply fall short long before gaini
2.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
I think what I have stated is quite fair and established at this point in documented human history... There's no reason to play games and shy away from the truth and reality anymore. This continued games we play with each other via mas
3.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
You're welcome to contact me when it occurs. I think I defined who I was in an earlier comment against the advice of someone who claimed it might impact my ability to get capital in the future.
4.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Old foundations are meant to be redefined/invalidate by new. - Complexity theory - Computational Theory - Graph Theory Are all subsets of Information theory. They're approaches/frames. New ones can be created that invalidate
5.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
That's fine. I don't hide who I am. I've discussed things on various accounts/mediums over the years and more increasingly have no concern about restricting my identity. Maybe you can make accurate assumptions as to why
6.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
I never understood why it was any different or why they attempted to compel others to 'dump everything they had publicly'. No one who comes across something as powerful as AGI is going to think : Yeah, why don't I just publis
7.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
> To "avoid enabling uses of AI or AGI that harm humanity or unduly concentrate power" what does one do with an idea or line of research that could potentially harm humanity or unduly concentrate power? You don't publish i
8.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
My framing is that it could exist and the broad majority would be none the wiser. My framing also is that a number of groups/individuals have likely exposed enough to cause people to question as to what stage they are in their developm
9.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
It could be many things. There is a spectrum of Human Intelligence. There is a spectrum of capability of Artificial Intelligence that can be produced by a spectrum of individual Human Intelligence. Do you believe, given many years of histor
10.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
You stated it yourself in post : > there is absolutely no indication whatsoever that OpenAI would credibly reach this (vague, underspecified) goal before any of the other serious contenders. > Nor would competitors have any requireme
11.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
This is what always amazed me about the AI safety groups... and mission statements for funding therein : There is nothing to suggest the minds and efforts capable of producing AGI will not have solved this at a fundamental level. Absolutely
12.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Agreed but it is such lines that bring in the $$$ in the valley. At some point, humanity has to cut the fluff and games and get to the fundamentals so we can all rise much higher heights of our collective intelligence. It's very hard t
13.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Profit seeking. Career building. Fame and prominence aren't sinister. Instead they are common human motivation. Common enough to easily group a significant portion of the Grandiosity centered around 'AI'. What easily breaks t
14.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
> I concede to your clear and inarguable expertise and proof on the matter; best of luck with your demonstration! There's a reason why this technology ultimately 'comes out of nowhere'. It is not that it will come out of n
15.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
They [each individual development group] has power over their own funded development and work. Anyone working on this problem sincerely values AI safety and its a component of developing and securing the foundations of AGI. An out of contro
16.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
It also depends on your capability to discover the underpinnings of Strong AI... Certain mindsets preclude one from doing so. If you truly understood the underpinnings of StrongAI and weren't moved to heavily restrict publicized detail
17.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Check my comment history. I can assure you its true as I will demonstrate in the near future. As for the security, you'd have no ability to penetrate internal aspects of it without physical and detectable access patterns. This is achie
18.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
The true nature of AGI research has always been heavy restrictions on the core aspects of the technology. This is where true safety and sensibility is achieved. Those who've stated otherwise or with much verbiage eventually arrive at t
19.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Weak AI is dangerous because it has no intelligence. It is fundamentally structured as a dumb/blind optimization process. The efforts necessary to proof safety/security for such a system could very well outweigh the amount of deve
20.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
Safety has become a convoluted term for pseudo control over unintelligent and unpredictable Weak AI. The safety problem as it is framed in its current state centers on principal ideology for Weak AI and has, from what I can see, nothing to
21.
by s1dechnl 8y ago
You are correct in many ways namely on a technical/compatibility level. Having no fundamental understanding of how AGI is structured or operates on a technical level renders most efforts & policies on safety mute. If more efforts w
22.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
Having not defined what intelligence is and having not declared the nature of General Intelligence, you're sure an aspect of clearly defined weak AI is a significant contribution to 'AGI'... Interesting. > It's true t
23.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
Revised : It's been solved although not publicly disclosed. There are an incredible number of locks on (Human Beings) that necessarily have to be unlocked to produce AGI. https://twitter.com/monad_ai/status/95
24.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
I'm self funded. I have been for a number of years and throughout the crucial stages of my work. I chose this route to ensure the integrity of my work. While I have always remained truthful which indeed has consequence, I am becoming m
25.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
Ayyyy, that you know of... And of an intelligence adequate enough to develop General AI is an intelligence capable of making a good lock. The ones placed on you seem to be holding steady after-all.
26.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
> Gene editing Those aren't the locks I'm talking about and you should take note that its possible because you have environmental access to them. > is very complex and fragile Indeed. Terminal error could result in a particu
27.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
I was waiting to see if anyone would catch that... ;) Now that you have made the connection and understand that I am centered on AGI, you probably understand that a big portion of my work has to do with negating the [elusive] side channels.
28.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
I don't recall portraying anyone in that light. I highlighted the nature of an industry. Who aligns themselves to this nature was left unstated. If this clear and present truth offends, its likely because it has merit and is validated
29.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
> Until someone comes up with a better definition of intelligence that's what I'm sticking with. You'll get a capability demo instead. It wont fail to impress. Definitions and designs are for another day. > I think you&
30.
by s1dechnl 9y ago
As I wasn't able to reply to [throwaway397537] directly, I'll reply here : > (1) What sort of tests is it going through? * Latency/performance * Scaling * Data flow Observation trials * Progressively difficult and open en

More ›