ryandickherber

5 ms·

1.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
> I'm not sure you've taken any time to think through the implications of what you've just suggested. Why would you assume that? I've put enormous thought into this and read much literature on it. See Murray Rothbard, Stefan Molyneux, L
2.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
Sure, I can tell you how I would think it would likely work, but of course people could be innovative and invent solutions that are better than what I envision. Basically, if you are the victim of a crime, you wouldn't want to just seek jus
3.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
But voters don't really have any power if all they can do is vote for representatives every two years. This is basically meaningless. They would have much more power if they could choose which police they used, which courts they went to, et
4.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
Anonymous isn't putting them behind bars, but by releasing names, communities can ostracize these people and keep them away from children.
5.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
I think it's a much better than a monopoly on force, which is a moral hazard that will always be abused. We'd be much better off with a free market of law enforcement and courts, like with anything else.
6.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
This is just free market law enforcement. No reason to wait some self-designated "authorities" to deliver justice. Edit: I'd appreciate it if people who downvote all my comments explain why they are downvoting. I am writing thoughtful respo
7.
by ryandickherber 15y ago
> You loose money if you buy physical coins... Gold and silver coins also cost more than spot.