rwxsh

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rwxsh 4y ago

   I have the Avegant Glyph, which is fixed, and I it is uncomfortable. It's natural to move your head to change your view, but that doesn't work with these devices. In practice I use a Quest instead, but even Daydream was more comfo
2. 2.▲
   by rwxsh 5y ago

   The modern equivalent is the Web Platform Tests[1], which are far more extensive than the Acid tests were. Browser conformance is tracked continuously[2]. [1] https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt [2] https:/
3. 3.▲
   by rwxsh 5y ago

   I probably shouldn't nitpick here, but Chrome's WebCodecs team is a subset of the Media team. Color simply wasn't the first priority to implement. What has changed is that more functionality got pulled into WebCodecs as it be
4. 4.▲
   by rwxsh 5y ago

   > Project leaders from Ffmpeg, Google, Mozilla, Microsoft (and probably Nvidia and AMD) need to all get together and decide on a single method. Speaking non-officially as a browser implementer, VUI isn't always reliable as a source
5. 5.▲
   by rwxsh 6y ago

   Rust has this, it's `let ... = match { ... };`.
6. 6.▲
   by rwxsh 7y ago

   > You think this affects video decoding? Speaking for Chrome's implementation, efficiently rendering video on macOS does require CALayer compositing, but it's not sufficient. Only certain types of decoded frames can be efficien
7. 7.▲
   by rwxsh 7y ago

   https://qalculate.github.io/
8. 8.▲
   by rwxsh 9y ago

   https://www.w3.org/TR/web-packaging/