rwaldron

7 ms·

1.
by rwaldron 8y ago
That's correct, but only half correct :) Johnny-Five programs can run on board any SBC that runs Linux and can support Node.js. For those platforms, GPIO and serial bus interfaces are interacted with directly; examples include Raspberr
2.
by rwaldron 9y ago
"linting" is subjective, preferential—not required. Python built linting into the language itself and it's super annoying.
3.
by rwaldron 9y ago
> behaviour is well defined. True, and we could go one step further: it's unambiguously defined, with invariant rules that can be used to prove a conformant implementation.
4.
by rwaldron 9y ago
> Looks like it's been fixed in ES5 That was published 9 years ago.
5.
by rwaldron 9y ago
9999999999999999 > Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER === true JavaScript numbers are IEEE754 double precision floating point format.
6.
by rwaldron 9y ago
PL = Programming Language
7.
by rwaldron 11y ago
Actually, 4 years ago and then again 3 years ago I said it was a total disaster. I have mountains of email reports from an audit of the project.
8.
by rwaldron 11y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX7wtNOkuHo
9.
by rwaldron 11y ago
You're conflating "JavaScript the programming language" with "DOM, the awful sack of shit". Don't do that.
10.
by rwaldron 11y ago
I absolutely agree with this. Several years ago I did the same exercise with Zepto, which definitively disproved its compatibility claim.
11.
by rwaldron 11y ago
Yes, performance comparisons, but those could've been measurements of no-op versions of functions by the same name.
12.
by rwaldron 11y ago
There isn't a single test for this project. How can its claims of jQuery-alike-ness be supported? Tests, or it doesn't exist.
13.
by rwaldron 13y ago
If Facebook made use of smart OCAP practices, none of that would be possible. Use of object identity as a "security key" would prevent code that doesn't have access to the "key" object from being successful.
14.
by rwaldron 13y ago
Boooorrrrring.
15.
by rwaldron 13y ago
Open Wash.
16.
by rwaldron 13y ago
Everyone loves a bit of HN-google-twitter juice for publishing some controversial anti-jQuery diatribe. yawn
17.
by rwaldron 13y ago
No, they mean Node.bind(), it's a Polymer proposal.
18.
by rwaldron 13y ago
> To be perfectly honest, I think it's a bit of a reach to suggest that I "probably need jQuery" because strict mode limitations caused problems within jQuery once upon a time (like, isn't that basically jQuery fixing
19.
by rwaldron 13y ago
I wasn't being snarky, I was making playful jokes :P
20.
by rwaldron 13y ago
MooTools modified built-in objects in future hostile ways. Do you miss that too?
21.
by rwaldron 13y ago
So... browserify is like http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131111220942/harrypo... ?
22.
by rwaldron 13y ago
> These aren't really what the author claims. As the author, I can assure you they are what I claim them to be: Points in the source code that identify some issue in some browser. > The first two are actually the same thing, Who
23.
by rwaldron 13y ago
<3 lol
24.
by rwaldron 13y ago
If you like spirit, you'll love this: https://gist.github.com/rwaldron/8720084#file-reasons-md
25.
by rwaldron 13y ago
Take only what you need https://github.com/jquery/jquery#modules
26.
by rwaldron 13y ago
OMG, you should file a ticket for jQuery core to implement some kind of system for breaking up the source into modules!! Here's a link: https://github.com/jquery/jquery#modules
27.
by rwaldron 13y ago
"poor intentionally provocative OP"? How is a list of irrefutable facts a "poor intentionally provocative [original post]"? Show me how smart you are!
28.
by rwaldron 13y ago
...Which is an argument in _favor_ of jQuery. You silly goose!
29.
by rwaldron 13y ago
My favorite part is how I learned that I don't need to use `var`—I can make everything global!!
30.
by rwaldron 13y ago
You're welcome. It's every line of the jQuery source code, syntax highlighted by github. http://www.amazon.com/Pinzon-Egyptian-Cotton-725-Gram-6-Piec... For your tears.

More ›