rvitorper

6 ms·

1.
by rvitorper 5mo ago
Nice. Do you have any resources on the latter? I'd really like to see how much easier is a data driver state machine
2.
by rvitorper 5mo ago
Hey, thanks a lot for the comment! The supervisor I added - which is a super simple one - ticks using the time.Ticker, which I assume only works with regular intervals. I think adding the built-in exponential backoff would be a nice thing t
3.
by rvitorper 5mo ago
Hey, thanks a lot for commenting. That seems like a nice way to encode state. Did you ever have issues with multiple states being activated at the same time? I'll take some time to explore the hierarchical state machine, as I haven&#x2
4.
by rvitorper 5mo ago
Hey, thanks a lot for the comment. I'd love to see some code about the "express state machines as data". I always had a hard time with state machines, because every time I needed to add a new node, I had to reason about too m
5.
by rvitorper 5mo ago
Hey, thanks a lot for the comment. I was thinking about the parallel composite nodes and I was wondering what would make good additions to the project. What do you think? I was going to start implementing something like RequireAny and Requi
6.
Show HN: Go-Bt: Minimalist Behavior Trees for Go(github.com)
62 points by rvitorper 5mo ago|12 comments
7.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Somebody, somewhere tried to rollback something and it failed
8.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Exactly
9.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Amen, brother
10.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
It’s a bot responding. That much I can tell
11.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Yes
12.
Ask HN: Why put a HAProxy in front of Nginx?
3 points by rvitorper 11mo ago|2 comments
13.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
I can’t unsee it either. Will try it later
14.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Right?? Omg, I felt the same way!
15.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
They are still high on their power trip. They say creators will have an “opportunity” because creators “think YT might have made a mistake”. What a huge ass announcement
16.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Makes sense. Thanks for the comment
17.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Postgres. It was also a single instance, which made it significantly easier. But nice to know that this is an issue on SQL Server
18.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Does anyone have performance issues with uuidv4? I worked with a db with 10s of billions of rows, no issues whatsoever. Would love to hear the mileage of fellow engineers
19.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
As an outsider, I have two questions: - why is Shopify kind of hated in the comments? - what is it DHH said? Hoping for some context
20.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
I like it. Simple, easy, htmx and Flask, batteries-included. Exactly what I was looking for
21.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
I’ve heard of a major fintech in South America that stores all the client state on the backend. Millions of users daily and it works
22.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Next.js is still missing lots of backend stuff. Background jobs, cron jobs, queues, etc.
23.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Scala mentioned
24.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
I like Caddy. Good to see it evolve. Hope it works well
25.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
We all love a vendor lock-in, don’t we? Until it backstabs us and we go back to VMs
26.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Looks premium, eco-responsible, powerful, just like the M4. And the M3. And the one before. Does anyone know what exactly changed this year?
27.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Even in the “low-performing” zone of the single threaded SQLite and Turso, we are still talking about 50k rows per second and 1000 microseconds, aka 1 ms. It is insanely fast. 1ms is just the round-trip for my Postgres on RDS. It is amazing
28.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
BEAM for the win
29.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
I can relate to this
30.
by rvitorper 11mo ago
Can’t argue with that. Machines are pretty capable, and elixir is awesome as well

More ›