rvcdbn

7 ms·

1.
by rvcdbn 3mo ago
oracle planning a new jvm language? have we ever seen a feature like this that is explicitly not usable from Java?
2.
Show HN: No-install, end-to-end encrypted HTML artifact sharing for agents(askhuman.app)
2 points by rvcdbn 3mo ago|0 comments
3.
by rvcdbn 4mo ago
Article is mistaken these subs are not available to businesses. Companies are paying much closer to API prices. The strategy is to get you accustomed to infinite tokens on your personal sub and bet that behavior transfers to work.
4.
by rvcdbn 6mo ago
maybe of interest: https://github.com/cloudflare/vinext (haven't tried it myself)
5.
by rvcdbn 7mo ago
It's not hidden at all, Claude pushes it even tho it poisons the context after every edit with false positives because it's always out of date. This feature should be hidden given how half baked it is.
6.
by rvcdbn 8mo ago
couldn't opencode just switch to agent sdk?
7.
by rvcdbn 11mo ago
deno does support per-host network permissions https://docs.deno.com/runtime/fundamentals/security/#network...
8.
Free Universe Splitter(freeuniversesplitter.com)
3 points by rvcdbn 1y ago|0 comments
9.
by rvcdbn 1y ago
I'm sure there's a reason but I would expect a system like this to use leader leases for local reads
10.
by rvcdbn 2y ago
IMO there really needs to be a way to mark all variables non-null by default at package or at least a file level. Otherwise there will be a strong safety argument for always using T! syntax on almost every variable and this will just be a l
11.
by rvcdbn 2y ago
Anyone who knowingly developed this should be tried held personally responsible.
12.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
"software is a force multiplier" well maybe that's the point. I am a superstitious b*tch but maybe the Universe doesn't want our force to be multiplied any more!!!!
13.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
I've been trading for 4 years on the side mostly on intuition. I like to think one can emotionally program the powerful computer that is the unconscious mind to serve the distributed monster of global finance for profit. Sometimes I ev
14.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
true but as engineers we should sometimes sacrifice and live in the future a bit to maximize opportunity and in the future hardware will adapt to software as it always has
15.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
Basic age verification is pretty easy, no? I’m not sure about the details but this seems like a pretty low bar for a site like this. Not that I’m advocating it be required but just that if it were me I would not make something like this wit
16.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
How exactly do you imagine those laws would be structured?
17.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
wow I’ve never heard it put like that but that’s exactly it! I definitely have the second type of reaction. It really feels like short-term hypomania (have some experience with that too).
18.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
can’t wait to get this CRISPR’ed into me
19.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
would be great to put some examples in your README especially for those of us not so familiar with the concept
20.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
it’s open source you can add the feature to download the code yourself if you want it. being open source is also just a good thing in itself because it’s contributing to the total body of code available for others to extend and use in whate
21.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
Ah I think I get it. While it might be true that the average (imagined) future observer will have a history which is anthropically biased in this way we cannot use this reasoning to make predictions about which particular future we will fin
22.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
I would really love the opportunity to clarify my thinking on this. Is there any way I could ask you to explain it to me in more detail? I can compensate you for your time.
23.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
I wonder if there’s a side channel attack in there waiting to happen..
24.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
Unfortunately it seems like we have hit an impasse. I don’t really understand why you think this is invalid but I would love to be proved wrong. If you would like to continue this discussion over email (or whatever) I’d love that: hn at ech
25.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
That’s a super interesting point. I feel like it’s getting at some deep personality trait around optimism/pessimism (or realism as the pessimists would say ;) so perhaps it’s not surprising that it’s so divisive.
26.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
Not a lawyer but seems like the kind of behavior that would or at least should pierce limited liability.
27.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
So you’re saying that that line of reasoning depends on people existing in the future and thinking about the same kinds of things we do now in the same kinds of ways (at least wrt this particular argument). I can see how that is not guarant
28.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
Why? If the argument works at this point in time when reflecting on our history what makes it stop working for future observers who reflect on their histories? It can certainly lead you to some pretty wacky-sounding conclusions (looking at
29.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
You're probably right about the Portugal example, I don't know enough about it to know if it is the solution for sure. I was just grasping for what I could only think of as the best possible solution. Perhaps there truly is no sol
30.
by rvcdbn 3y ago
I said "there is a line of reasoning...", I didn't say I fully believe it. It definitely depends on a lot of pretty speculative ideas. I'm happy to discuss this further if you'd like to point out exactly which parts

More ›