ruszki

5 ms·

1.
by ruszki 4d ago
I'm using Kagi every day, and unfortunately, it is not true anymore. I think what happens is that the blanket banning of IP ranges because of LLMs, and flat out incompetence and laziness, affects them heavily. I get results, or just a
2.
by ruszki 9d ago
The worst urinal which I used was in Brussels about 15 years ago, and with that "splash-back reducing" mat. And it covered every part of the inner wall of the urinal. The mat caused the exact opposite of what it was supposed to do
3.
by ruszki 10d ago
That 40 percent is definitely not true in the general audience. Also they will load ads, just not all of them. Surveys ask that. Especially on mobile, and apps. Also, when we measured on our car rental site, with near perfect precision (it&
4.
by ruszki 11d ago
Yes, but first of all, people make those decisions. And second, unlike those people, you don't need to have dissonant answers, and don't need to lie to yourself. And you can still live quite comfortably.
5.
by ruszki 11d ago
Google should have been split up into shreds like 2 decades ago. Search wants to have income from ads? Good sell it to anybody who pays the most, just like every single newspaper does. Gmail wants to sell our data, or ad space? Good sell th
6.
by ruszki 11d ago
But before ChatGPT,, models had already done that, like all the time, and nobody questioned that these types of models (LLMs) wouldn't be next token predictors, since this is just an inference input data topic. This is questioned only
7.
by ruszki 12d ago
Compared to 2016, it can do a lot of things, but it still fails for example with recommending a setup for my Raspberry Pi to have a 4G connection with some parameters (I want to use as a gateway between VoLTE calls and SMS, and my SIP serve
8.
by ruszki 15d ago
My experience with such problems, is that they stay for this long because nobody cares, not because it's impossible, or even technically too difficult. So hopefully, LLM will improve things, but that quote is a lie.
9.
by ruszki 20d ago
As several others have already said here, GrapheneOS is not necessarily rooted. So that's a lie. Also, I've seen such audits internally, and they don't care about security at all. They care about the theatrics of security waa
10.
by ruszki 20d ago
Malwares can possibly do that even on non rooted phones if a privilege escalation attack is possible. And just yesterday, there was an article here about exactly one of those. Also I highly doubt that there is any real statistics anywhere a
11.
by ruszki 23d ago
This is even funnier than how some people defended Apple, that they allow changing OSs on Apple silicon MacBooks.
12.
by ruszki 23d ago
The stupid rules were imposed by member countries, and not by the EU. There are several countries, like Italy, Hungary who were not imposed that stupid rules, because EU didn't force anybody to have this level of stupidity in these rul
13.
by ruszki 27d ago
So because of the hardship of renaming a file, creating a symlink, or importing another file, you rename a file. If somebody switches because of this, then they lie.
14.
by ruszki 28d ago
Here is a constructive one then: delete it. It’s better for everyone. If I want to read AI slop about your open source code, I can ask LLMs directly. It’s cheaper for you, and everybody.
15.
by ruszki 29d ago
You are right, I remembered wrong. Netflix degraded the quality for me for years, according to them because of lack of DRM. It was because of lack of hardware DRM.
16.
by ruszki 29d ago
It’s still hollow and cheap. I closed those sites immediately even before LLMs. You need to pay me to waste my time, not the other way around. Even if that’s using your then not-so-free app.
17.
by ruszki 1mo ago
The alt-right party in Hungary - Fidesz - at least since 2006, and the Republican Party since at least Trump, definitely targeted people who are fine with a broken belief systems, in other words, they are fine with continuous cognitive diss
18.
by ruszki 1mo ago
But… but they allowed. For a long time. Netflix didn’t need that.
19.
by ruszki 1mo ago
But every bank app which I used had a button to copy all of those directly.
20.
by ruszki 1mo ago
Reasonable? A concern which is based on no real data?
21.
by ruszki 1mo ago
You can also reason the same way on some complete nonsense. A lot of us do this all the time.
22.
by ruszki 1mo ago
Technically speaking, it’s possible to have the same kind of requests for legit content and ads. It’s also possible to randomize the response type (ad or content). In that case the only way to solve this before sending a request is to break
23.
by ruszki 1mo ago
There is a difference between bugs/failures, and false advertisement. The solution used here has well known shortcomings.
24.
by ruszki 1mo ago
I was just interested how it works, because above it was sold as “it works”, when in reality, “it works*”.
25.
by ruszki 1mo ago
Yes, I read it. That means that it doesn’t work in those cases. Btw, as a developer it’s very easy to have something like that. It’s not as trivial as it seems at all. I encountered with similar problems all the time, with similar solutions
26.
by ruszki 1mo ago
So, if the program or the proxy solution doesn’t support it, then it doesn’t work? Like with security solutions?
27.
by ruszki 1mo ago
But how? Normally the TLS handshake and encryption/decryption happen in user space. Even the kernel doesn’t know anything about it.
28.
by ruszki 1mo ago
But on some level I understand the immediate low level criticism. Of course, it’s stupid to criticize something without reading about it. However, I’ve seen waaaay more studies which was made with even lower effort. For example, the other d
29.
by ruszki 1mo ago
> If they can do the job they can do the role. Obviously. Can they do the job? Because right now, government decisions are based on AI generated code, which was verified by nobody who can do that. So the cost of an unsatisfactory answer
30.
by ruszki 2mo ago
The long tail dream didn’t really happen in any single market which was democratized the same way in the past. Why do you expect something else now, especially on an already oversaturated market?

More ›