rusini

7 ms·

1.
StrangeLoop Conference to be held Sep 30 – Oct 2 if Covid contingency permits(thestrangeloop.com)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
2.
Show HN: Compiler Optimizations Playground(github.com)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
3.
Show HN: Passerine – extensible functional scripting language – v0.8.0 released(passerine.io)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
4.
Perceus: Garbage Free Reference Counting with Reuse [pdf](microsoft.com)
3 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
5.
by rusini 6y ago
Syntax-wise, MANOOL is a homoiconic programming language. It has its advantages and drawbacks, as everything, but it is definitely not designed to cause first good impression to those who are not familiar with such concept (seen, e.g., in C
6.
Native Runtime Performance for High-Level Dynamically Typed Programming Language(manool.org)
9 points by rusini 6y ago|3 comments
7.
Show HN: Manool v0.6 is Out
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
8.
Manool is meant to make exploratory programming safer and faster(manool.org)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
9.
How do I succeed with my programming language?(reddit.com)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
10.
Goo – generic object orientator (programming language)(people.csail.mit.edu)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
11.
Show HN: Benchmarking several dynamic languages on array-heavy code(github.com)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
12.
Show HN: A primer on the programming language MANOOL: Conway's Game of Life(reddit.com)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
13.
Manool: Move ops, sugar for updates, value semantics, and reference semantics(reddit.com)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
14.
by rusini 6y ago
IMHO, the language size DOES matter and IS related to the language complexity and especially the syntax complexity. However, I believe many designers ARE aware of complexity issues and many languages turn into a mess only with time. BTW, I
15.
Manool: Move ops, sugar for updates, value semantics, and reference semantics(reddit.com)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
16.
By-value or copy-on-write semantics in imperative programming languages(reddit.com)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
17.
Functional language with streamlined syntax and copy-on-write composite types(manool.org)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
18.
Show HN: Practical Programming Language with Expressive Power, in 10 KLOC C++11(manool.org)
1 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
19.
Show HN: "Manool" (emerging programming language) Tutorial – Lesson 1(manool.org)
2 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
20.
Show HN: Practical Programming Language with Expressive Power, in 10 KLOC C++11(manool.org)
7 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
21.
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in 10 Programming Languages(github.com)
3 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
22.
New Release of the Programming Language “Manool” (v0.5 – RC for Version 1.0)(github.com)
4 points by rusini 6y ago|0 comments
23.
Show HN: Practical programming language with expressive power, in 10 KLOC C++11(github.com)
3 points by rusini 7y ago|0 comments
24.
Manool-Practical Language with Universal Syntax and Only Library-Level Features(manool.org)
26 points by rusini 7y ago|13 comments
25.
by rusini 7y ago
I know :) And that's cool, and that property is the base of my own programming language. I am also trying right now to find some explanation why it's cool based on some fundamental conclusions from theoretic computer science...
26.
by rusini 7y ago
And even Scheme.
27.
by rusini 7y ago
The syntax of S-expressions is the syntax. It's a form to serialize trees (made out of pairs) and it is described by some grammar.
28.
by rusini 7y ago
I have designed a programming language that borrows an important part of its architecture from Lisp(s) (maybe mostly Scheme, but also Kernel: http://klisp.org ). However, I have always opposed to the concrete syntax of S-expressi
29.
by rusini 7y ago
Wow, are we preparing for a global catastrophe?
30.
Manool.org – programming language “Manool” – official website(manool.org)
1 points by rusini 7y ago|0 comments

More ›