Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
runeks
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
runeks
20d ago
No secret sauce is needed to be valuable
2.
▲
by
runeks
24d ago
Ah, you're right. My mistake.
3.
▲
by
runeks
24d ago
I'd like to have a model that just "knows" our code base and past issues, instead of having to query them for the same reason I don't want the model to have to query a dictionary to speak proper English. I could be mista
4.
▲
by
runeks
24d ago
> We do the finetuning only on small semantic data were it helps a lot. This sounds interesting. Would you care to expand a bit on how you do this? What is this semantic data? > There are companies though which ahve this exact problem
5.
▲
by
runeks
24d ago
Somewhat off topic, but I've started wondering if we can actually make local LLMs feel smarter than the frontier closed models, by post-training it for your specific use case. Say Company X has a software product which consists of a mi
6.
▲
by
runeks
29d ago
Surely it would depend on your model, since they need to etch this into silicon.
7.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
Comment threads like these are why I read HN comments. Thank you for the insights, both of you.
8.
▲
Oracle VM VirtualBox Bug Discovered by AI: CVE-2026-60161
(octane.beehiiv.com)
4 points
by
runeks
2mo ago
|
1 comments
9.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
> I still wonder why some of our key universities in the US aren't building Open Weight Models. I'm guessing the $100m price tag plays a role. Plus the fact that it will be outdated next quarter.
10.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
https://archive.ph/2026.07.09-085648/https://www.economist.c...
11.
▲
A man who would change Russia
(economist.com)
4 points
by
runeks
2mo ago
|
1 comments
12.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
> I think the opposite: I think the frontier labs have good margins on their inference unit costs. Interesting. Good enough to make up for training costs? Also, where can I read more about this?
13.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
> Good guess. The actual mechanism [...] Why couldn't both these factors contribute to the result of the study?
14.
▲
by
runeks
2mo ago
> enforce right to repair How much would this change Niño surface temperatures, you reckon?
15.
▲
Heat Wave in Europe Shatters Records in Denmark, Switzerland and Czech Republic
(cbc.ca)
10 points
by
runeks
3mo ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
It's a proof of concept that it's possible to etch a neural net into a chip and get massive performance (and efficiency) boost
17.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
If performance per watt is 100x better than GPUs (as GP link claims) then I don't think it's a hard sell at all. That's actually a cost reduction that matters.
18.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
> But if the growth requires capital (an investment, a loan, or the wealth the founders already have), the situation becomes less clear. How much of the success can be attributed to the contributions of the founders and how much is based
19.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
> So he has set up a system that extracts value from others. That's a very negative way to describe buying a share in a company.
20.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
> [...] but their coils get saturated at higher RPMs meaning they lose efficiency at highway speeds (which actually affect the range number people car about). This seems like a big disadvantage. Highway is exactly where EVs fare worst co
21.
▲
by
runeks
3mo ago
> Consciousness doesn’t require thinking, it only requires perception. Could we imagine a human being that is conscious but has no sensory input nor any occurring thoughts but is still conscious?
22.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
> We literally spend almost all day, every day, thinking about ourselves, in terms of our inner self. > That is consciousness. So thinking is consciousness? Can there be consciousness without content? E.g. can I just be conscious of b
23.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
https://archive.ph/2026.05.29-114338/https://www.economist.c...
24.
▲
The dangerous delusion of modern warfare
(economist.com)
38 points
by
runeks
4mo ago
|
81 comments
25.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
Writing software for which a full spec is available before you begin — in this case the rules of chess — was an easy problem even before AI.
26.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
> Efficiency is about using minimum cpu cycles or minimum memory or minimum network round trip or more generically using minimum/optimum resources to get something done. No profitable business wants to pay you for writing code that
27.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
No the assumption is just lower price increases demand
28.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
> That said the hardware is great, I run Asahi on another M1 MBP and Linux makes it the best laptop I've ever used. I'm considering going this way on my M1 MBP. Is there anything you miss wrt. hardware compatibility?
29.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
I wanted to see how well Akademikerpension has done wrt. returns. This graph shows average yearly return from the financial crisis 2009 until 2021 and they are actually the best performing among other Danish pension funds [1]. [1] https:&#
30.
▲
by
runeks
4mo ago
Why does everyone seem to assume that there is a finite amount of work available? If all of the sudden it becomes possible to build a B2B company at 10x less cost which can save its customer, say, $1m per year and before this company cost $
More ›