rrevi

8 ms·

1.
MTPLX 1.0.0(github.com)
3 points by rrevi 3mo ago|1 comments
2.
by rrevi 3mo ago
I have been using MTPLX (replaced oMLX for me) on my M5 Pro with 64GB with Qwen3.6 27B Optimized Quality (getting about 16-19 generated tps, which is exactly double what I saw before use of MTP model and this tool) and along with OpenCode h
3.
by rrevi 3mo ago
related https://x.com/cohere/status/2064378058329526556
4.
by rrevi 5mo ago
The device nomenclature alone is worth the read! (otherwise an impressive feat to see)
5.
SQLite on Rails is fast, but SQLite on Helidon is faster!(rrevi.github.io)
3 points by rrevi 1y ago|0 comments
6.
by rrevi 2y ago
Which now begs the question, sqlite3_rsync vs Litestream[0]? [0] https://litestream.io/
7.
by rrevi 2y ago
And made it to the news section of the SQLite site on Oct. 21st 2024: https://sqlite.org/news.html
8.
by rrevi 4y ago
More on bail bonds: https://youtu.be/IS5mwymTIJU And more on bail reform: https://youtu.be/xQLqIWbc9VM
9.
by rrevi 4y ago
See here https://crystal-lang.org/used_in_prod/
10.
About the Iron Searcher(rrevi.dev)
1 points by rrevi 4y ago|0 comments
11.
by rrevi 4y ago
Thanks for sharing compumike! Very cool!! If you don’t mind me asking, why did you choose the Crystal programming language for this project?
12.
by rrevi 4y ago
“Rendered by the Crystal programming language in 739 µs.” Very nice!
13.
by rrevi 4y ago
Thanks! I'm sure this type of benchmark (bubble sort) has been done many times over in the past. But yes, it'd be interesting to see it across ruby versions, ruby implementations, and across languages etc.
14.
Let's compare the run performance of a bubble sort script with Crystal and Ruby(rrevi.github.io)
3 points by rrevi 4y ago|2 comments
15.
About Crystal(rrevi.github.io)
6 points by rrevi 4y ago|0 comments
16.
Ruby 3.0 is now concurrent, the Ruby way via the Fiber primitive(rrevi.github.io)
1 points by rrevi 4y ago|0 comments