Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
roundsquare
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
roundsquare
10y ago
Thanks, that's basically how I saw it. I guess that's one way how this proof essentially makes the problem discrete (in addition to assuming perfect driving).
2.
▲
by
roundsquare
10y ago
Is the following correct? This proof depends on the fact that in the clause gadget (figure 5) the car can't turn once it jumps to the cheek point. Because of this, it can't in from the track for one for one variable to that for an
3.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I was under the impression that we were very close to being able to move sensors with our minds. http://www.ted.com/talks/tan_le_a_headset_that_reads_your_br...
4.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I'm sorry, but are people not able to ignore this? I, like everyone, use Google all the time and I didn't even notice this till now. There are times when pointing out something that could be improved makes the experience worse. On top of
5.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Nah. I think the real benefit is that they have a "victory" every few hours to keep them going.
6.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Yeah. Having been locked in stairwells before (luckily not for too long) I don't usually take the stairs unless they are out in the open.
7.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"Why isn't blaming professors for cheaters analogous to blaming rape victims for being insufficiently vigilant against rape?" I don't think the analogy holds well. The point is that a professor is supposed to help his/her students when the
8.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
There certainly is such a thing as being too aggressive in trying to detect cheating. It happened to my dad once but he cleared it up by re-doing the problem from scratch in front of the teacher. I think it's absolutely critical that any a
9.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
To quote from the article: "Media Transcript Full Version"
10.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
But wait. With your blog now, either your family gets an update (maybe via an RSS feed) or they check it periodically. The same would be true of a public circle. Either they join the public circle an get an update when you post or they c
11.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"But besides all that, teaching is a profession that is charged with preparing and educating our youth for tomorrow. Obviously, teachers go into it knowing this, and often for that very reason. But in my eyes, that's quite a responsibility.
12.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
What am I missing? I don't see this as much different from a regular cook book...
13.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
When I was a freshmen at Cornell (2002) there were two possible intro classes: CS 101M was half java and half matlab CS 101J was mostly java with a week or two of matlab (recommended for CS majors) After this class (or the AP test) our next
14.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I think there is a good chance of google resisting this since they can add the features through other (integrated) apps. Why have messaging when you have GMail? Why have events when you have Google Calendar? Etc...
15.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I suppose I should be clear from this point on: I am against Google+ forcing people to show their gender. "Well... that's the point. I really don't want to talk about it as an ethical decision, and I guess I can avoid that by pointing out t
16.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I see what you're saying, but I don't think these two are in any way inconsistent. Gender equality starts with breaking down people's assumptions. If people just saw stick figures, I think they'd assume they were male. Thus, to break tha
17.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Just for fun... it might not be impossible: You can reduce R^2 to {x | 0<=x<=1}[1] and thus, by induction, we can reduce R^n to {x | 0<=x<=1} for any integer n. If I remember correctly, there are about 10^80 particles. The
18.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Is it just me, or do a lot of us geeks have a small font bias? Is it because we want more information on the screen? Personally, I like small fonts when I'm coding but larger fonts for other stuff.
19.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
You're making this into a business decision. I'm sure that google has put a lot of thought into this and made what they think is the best business decision (in addition to the fact that they are testing it in beta). There are, however, con
20.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"them" in the sentence probably referred to "gender issues" not "folks".
21.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Good point. I forgot we learned about "slices of a pizza" that early. By the way, the history of the degree is somewhat interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_(angle)
22.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Also quite difficult to get the same level of conversation.
23.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Haven't seen the movie but there is also a TV series. Its not very realistic though (according to a real life culture trainer).
24.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Sorry, I think I was unclear in my question. "cannot countenance the possibility that there is not a completely uniform distribution of ability across all conceivable human subgroups." What ability are you talking about? (This is not disag
25.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
AFAIK, under international law for statehood it would require a permanent population, a defined territory, government and capacity to enter into relations with the other states.[1] There is some precedent for non-states getting "internation
26.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"Now you forgot the bisexuals! ;p" You know, I thought that at firs too. I was going to say that it doesn't make sense to say a bisexual has B=0.5 and that we should have B_male and B_female. However, as I tried to think of a situation wh
27.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"Also do these women who don't want to disclose their gender really need Randall Munroe to file the bug report for them?" He's someone who gets listened to.
28.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
I don't understand this statement at all. Are you saying that he's ignoring the fact that women have different abilities to defend themselves from attackers?
29.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
"the problem is with degrees" I partly disagree. For kids, defining something using irrational numbers would probably be very confusing. Using integers is much easier. So, why 360? Because we talk about right angles a lot and we want to
30.
▲
by
roundsquare
15y ago
Why does smallest in terms of absolute value matter? In any event, I can define the circle via the center and r/2 or center and r/4, etc... I don't see any value in caring about the absolute value. As for dimensionality, how are you using
More ›