rotcev

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rotcev 4mo ago

   This is exactly what I first thought. “The user appears to be attempting to decode my previous thought process, …”, the question is whether or not the model will be able to internalize this in such a way that is undetectable to the aforemen
2. 2.▲
   by rotcev 5mo ago

   PS: Just to be clear - even the most expensive humans are unreliable, would make stupid mistakes, and their output MUST be reviewed carefully, so you’re not any different either. You’re just a random next-thought generator based on neuron f
3. 3.▲
   by rotcev 1y ago

   I use O3-pro not as a coding model, but as a strategic assistant. For me, the long delay between responses makes the model unsuitable for coding workflows, however, it is actually a feature when it comes to getting answers to hard questions
4. 4.▲
   by rotcev 2y ago

   This is the first article I’ve come across that truly utilizes LLMs in a workflow the right way. I appreciate the time and effort the author put into breaking this down. I believe most people who struggle to be productive with language mode
5. 5.▲
   A tutorial on the universality and expressiveness of fold (1999) [pdf](cs.nott.ac.uk)

   2 points by rotcev 7y ago|0 comments
6. 6.▲
   by rotcev 7y ago

   You might be interested in clojure.spec [1] too :) [1] https://clojure.org/guides/spec
7. 7.▲
   by rotcev 10y ago

   From personal experience, a functional programming style helps one to reason with the math used in artificial intelligence. This might be why lisp is considered one of the original AI languages. The power of being able to express the networ