rossjudson

5 ms·

1.
by rossjudson 1mo ago
Yep. Lots of money-ish examples.
2.
by rossjudson 1mo ago
Unauthorized removal of bitcoin from a wallet, depositing into another?
3.
by rossjudson 1mo ago
I think these four people want to be in a smaller organization. It's more fun.
4.
by rossjudson 2mo ago
Good, realistic take. There's a lot of context that can be drawn on to make better decisions and look for weird . And then agents come along and some people want their agent to be able to do anything they can do with zero friction. Th
5.
by rossjudson 2mo ago
Agreed; I don't think we want security controls to devolve into an argument between LLMs. Attacking and defending LLMs operate in an ecosystem, and are (hopefully) limited by constraints. Defending LLMs will be able to rely on and evol
6.
by rossjudson 2mo ago
+1000, and the role of non-deterministic security is to compose deterministic security primitives. Deterministic executes fast and you know what it will do. You want to evolve your ground truth, not hope for the best. That said, there is
7.
by rossjudson 3mo ago
- Liability - What can you really fit in HW4? - No right answers in many situations. - But mostly liability. It's pretty good.
8.
by rossjudson 3mo ago
You're highly critical. What would you be doing differently? So far Tridge has elected to: - generally decide to fix security issues over preserving compatibility - rewritten an aging test suite in what appears to be a highly responsib
9.
by rossjudson 3mo ago
Yeah, we definitely need to make sure that we take the considerations of the mob into account. The person owning the project is using the master branch in the way he sees fit. Incidentally, there is no amount of communicating "correct
10.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
I recommend "How to measure anything in cybersecurity risk". Really interesting read about putting actual value on security.
11.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
I'm truly hopeful that AI will open a new of prototyping. Back in the day, prototyping was how you figured out what to build, you'd very deliberately toss the entire first (or second!) version, and you'd plan to do that. High
12.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
I think that subscribing to another person's life prevents you from living your own. Also, "Everything is Lies, I Guess".
13.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
For me it's been useful as an idea categorizer: "oh well, that turned out to be a crap idea." It's allowed me to clear out some long-standing brush on the forest floor. And burn it down once or twice.
14.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Quoting: "Because the effort was removed, so was the commitment, and with the commitment the focus, and with the focus any meaningful product at all." This is the truth. Otherwise known as "easy come, easy go".
15.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
This is an excellent pattern; do as much as you can in the database. External Spanner provides changes streams. Internal spanner is different, mostly because of the extreme scaling requirements in some cases (and a healthy dose of "bec
16.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Yes, you are reading too much into things. The ultrawealthy are supporting the current MAGA nonsense because they wish to permanently lock up the massive wealth transfer they've engineered over the past two decades, and the only way to
17.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
If you live in a Red State, it is highly like that my Blue State money pays for your health care, highways, narcan, and a myriad of other transfers. Like, I feel for you and your situation, but I just don't think it's sustainable
18.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
I have a habit of upvoting attempts at civilized argument, so I upvote once again. For the "people who understand supply/demand", why use "want a limit" language? What you actually mean is "want a lower limit,
19.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Stop with your logic, please. Obviously they must complete American Nationalism training, readily available in whatever country they come from, which they can learn from Voice of America.
20.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
I cannot understand why people downvote otherwise civilized posts they disagree with, so I'll upvote. That said, you are impressively wrong. If someone doesn't agree with me because they choose to believe obviously false or made-u
21.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Well, the first thing the "new" antigravity did was f^&* up all of my existing projects by replicating them (with one replica per conversation within each project). That's really bad. I now have 45+ projects pointing at
22.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Like aphyr?
23.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Gun deaths in the US are just the cost of doing business, and business is booming (for some). Sad.
24.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
One person who spent 15 years learning and building in the domain. He very much knows what he's doing, what questions to ask, and what machines do.
25.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Every child reads a book about solving problems, assumes they can now solve problems, and is disappointed when that is not true.
26.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
If you write your own paper (mostly) and choose your own references (because you've actually read the papers) you won't have a problem.
27.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
This puts the burden to make sure it's right on the submitter, where it should be. Verification can come at any time after that; the submitter understands the consequences of hallucinated references. Verification can be crowd-sourced (
28.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
Not sure where the nefarious is in that. That's how PKI works.
29.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
100% up-to-date VSCode is still pretty trashy, IMO. It's a mixed bag of plugins without cohesion, no awareness of code other than what that mixed bag attempts to provide (poorly). It is and always has been little more than a progressiv
30.
by rossjudson 4mo ago
It's not about forcing everyone to use the same IDE. It's about making sure that there's at least one IDE that everyone can use. Over time, engineers realize that Code Search is more important than their IDE. Some of the most

More ›