Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rorychatt
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
rorychatt
29d ago
(not against GLPI, great product, just scarred from many projects in this space).
2.
▲
by
rorychatt
29d ago
Maybe. GLPI wouldn't get through commercial governance for most of the orgs I've worked, let alone floating the re-engineering business case to replace all the integrations that tend to amass over a decade. SME market might thin o
3.
▲
ServiceNow are pushing customers off SaaS – are other industries doing similar?
10 points
by
rorychatt
29d ago
|
5 comments
4.
▲
by
rorychatt
5mo ago
Why is significant economic value the metric for success? Skoda publishes the research and design openly (no patent, no product for sale), to solve a real problem (increase in bike-related accidents from noise cancelling headphones), to ens
5.
▲
by
rorychatt
6mo ago
ha. Cloud Native ≠ Native Cloud Services. I always found it odd that the marketing successfully pivoted the term Cloud Native from meaning 'managed services consumed as APIs over the internet' to a generic umbrella for self-hosted
6.
▲
by
rorychatt
6mo ago
The bet is that compute gets cheap enough before the crunch that it won't matter. You should model it at 10x - but you also need to factor in NPV and opportunity cost. Even if pricing spikes later, the value extracted at today's r
7.
▲
by
rorychatt
7mo ago
Yes
8.
▲
by
rorychatt
10mo ago
Very strange, this has always worked for me with Zed - both with local and remote ssh sessions. I use `"autosave": "on_focus_change"` which may be keeping my buffer in sync with the file contents as I switch between term
9.
▲
by
rorychatt
10mo ago
I had this today when I cancelled a Microsoft Subscription, where it asked me for feedback on why I left. One of the options they gave was because "My company needs an AI solution". None of the options had anything to do with why
10.
▲
by
rorychatt
1y ago
Building out test infrastructure for correctness to support the project sounds like a fantastic idea. That said, while it's compatible with Linux via fuse, unless you're helping to build RedoxOS, I don't think there's an
11.
▲
by
rorychatt
2y ago
I found things got a lot better when the proper apis and terraform zpa/zia coverage happened Still many foot guns, but I’ve much the same feelings for most of the tooling in the proxy/vpn space.
12.
▲
by
rorychatt
2y ago
> why that's a bad idea Given that traffic inspection for user and service proxies rely on MITM traffic inspection for many forms of IPS/IDS beyond basic SNI signature detection - I'd love to hear more! I'm not necess
13.
▲
by
rorychatt
2y ago
> staging->prod is a merge I might be misunderstanding what you mean by staging in this case. If so, my bad! I don't think staging ever actually gets merged into prod via git history, but is rather maintained as separate commit t
14.
▲
by
rorychatt
2y ago
> I believe the idea is that it makes it very explicit to track provenance of code between environments, eg merge staging->master is a branch merge operation.= That isn't quite my understanding - but I am happy to be corrected. T
15.
▲
by
rorychatt
2y ago
While I agree generally with the pattern (dynamically generating manifests, and using pipelines to co-ordinate pattern change), I could never quite figure out the value of using Branches instead of Folders (with CODEOWNER restrictions) or r
16.
▲
by
rorychatt
3y ago
> More generally, do you have to legally agree to Terms and Conditions to communicate with service provider's servers over HTTPS? Do you legally agree to them after you communicate one packet in such a way? Browsewrap agreements (ag
17.
▲
by
rorychatt
3y ago
I'm not sure. IANAL, but reading the developer policy, reference is made to include the Youtube Developer Site & Services, but is not exclusive of other Youtube API Services. Whether Invidious uses a Public Developer API, a Broker
18.
▲
by
rorychatt
3y ago
Is this legal? In Google's Terms and Conditions, it's says that bypassing ads violates Youtube's terms and conditions. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14129599?hl=en#:~:... .
19.
▲
by
rorychatt
3y ago
I get what the author is saying, but I feel like many of the examples provided have more to do with poor culture and chronic mismanagement rather than issues with “agile” itself. However, I don't believe Agile is the root cause of tech
20.
▲
by
rorychatt
4y ago
We use Terraform extensively at our organisation. Some examples come to mind that make this impractical: - For services that do support tags, we are already reaching limits on the number of tags that can be associated with a single resource
21.
▲
by
rorychatt
7y ago
In the organisations I have worked, we have normally done something like this: - <environment>-<component>-<application>.<application-portfolio/team>-<tenancy>.<hosting-environment>.<business_name
22.
▲
by
rorychatt
7y ago
An argument can be made that this is what Test Driven Development is here to solve. State intent in the test, not the comment. That said, I agree it can be a helpful contextual clue.
23.
▲
by
rorychatt
7y ago
It's a shame, BDNA's Technopedia used to have an excellent, free online search engine that could be leveraged to search EOL information. For context, Technopedia is a library that, for a yearly subscription, could supplement detai
24.
▲
by
rorychatt
8y ago
Can you talk to the problem Docker-Run is trying to solve? It's already relatively easy to deploy docker containers today (AWS/Azure/GCP/DigitalOcean/etc) and even have them pipe to the browser like this. Without an
25.
▲
by
rorychatt
8y ago
I'm all for the separation of concerns for managing underlying services! I just suspect most organisations have the scale to warrant running it themselves. Lets say it takes 5 engineers at 100k each to maintain the K8s and FaaS service
26.
▲
by
rorychatt
8y ago
Why not start with Fargate/App Engine, or skipping containers all together and going straight to FaaS on your cloud of choice? Small companies seem like the primary choice to skip container orchestration layers completely.
27.
▲
by
rorychatt
8y ago
Pivotal haven't launched a serverless framework, they've launched a FaaS(ish) framework. Serverless implies that the management of the underlying infrastructure is owned wholy by a third party, and the only exposure to you is the