ror6ax

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ror6ax 8y ago

   In reality it often means these systems are built in bad, ineffective way. Most likely in bad, ineffective languages/technologies. You don't need 17 years to be able to contribute to Apache Spark. You would not call that a small p
2. 2.▲
   by ror6ax 8y ago

   Good to them finally giving UX a serious thought, as well as using multicore and adding flatpak installation method. At least opensource affocinados stand some semblance of chance in PS/LR holywar.
3. 3.▲
   by ror6ax 8y ago

   Let's hope this will finally change the "compatibility with py3 is a feature" to "no py3 compatibility - no library" state of things. It's really surprising how stubborn some teams are.
4. 4.▲
   by ror6ax 8y ago

   Yep. What this situation shows is that open data is faaaar faaaar worse represented than open source. There is not even a faint whisper of possibility, you know, not using proprietary platform and use the internet the way it was meant to be
5. 5.▲
   by ror6ax 8y ago

   YOLO, people from IBM and Apple chiming in to preach about business decency. Now I've seen everything.
6. 6.▲
   by ror6ax 9y ago

   It's rather cute to so naively believe such practices can be maintained.