root_crontab

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by root_crontab 9y ago

   It is a perfectly adequate paper trail. It's much easier to check in a postmortem than shouting something across the desk. Like code review, because you know your approval will be recorded irrevocably, you just think it through that li
2. 2.▲
   by root_crontab 9y ago

   Someone says 'about to push this potentially breaking change to a shared resource, is that ok?'. Then everyone else posts a :thumbsup: Obviously, this could be done differently. But it's easy to do it like this and come to de
3. 3.▲
   by root_crontab 9y ago

   would you like a scoop of icecream with the cake?
4. 4.▲
   by root_crontab 9y ago

   I see too many of these. Write code to simulate something and obtain an inconclusive version of a result you can simply derive and prove definitively using statistics.
5. 5.▲
   by root_crontab 9y ago

   It seems like there was a mismatch in expectations that goes to the heart of how universities and philanthropy work. The university thought it was getting a donation, along with some vanity conditions, comparable to naming a building or a c