rollingdeep

5 ms·

1.
Stop the science training that demands ‘don’t ask’(nature.com)
2 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
2.
How taxpayers may wind up subsidizing Uber and WeWork’s losses(qz.com)
2 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
3.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
update >dang: I'm sorry it feels arbitrary. I think we're looking at this from different perspectives and continuing to argue about it will likely only be repetitive. One thing's for sure: if antitrust action against Fac
4.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
Because Zuckerberg already testified that election influence and interference was not a serious threat, it is newsworthy that he turns around here and says the opposite, that companies would not be able to control interference threats in th
5.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
This comment doesn’t make any sense.
6.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
Dang, that is not a stringent test any of kind. It is highly arbitrary. It is a list of your previous decisions on whether a post is new information—most of which are simply declarations of your decision and provide no stringent rules to te
7.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
The outcome was a settlement as a slap on the wrist for a company that size and that arrogant (did you watch Gates’ testimony?). Really no significant business practices were forced to change either.
8.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
When you are FB or Google or Amazon or you know... Microsoft... there are issues with how the government could ever effectively regulate such an industry with outsized funds (much larger than the fixed regulatory budgets) and power (influen
9.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
BBC coverage on this is a bit minimal and lazy. Posted already here with more coverage on Zuckerberg's comments about suing the government and election interference. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21133244
10.
Google examined WeWork search results; most alarming negative sentiment ever(insider.com)
2 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
11.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
Agreed that the formalism tends to be an appeal to authority or simply a way to appeal to a bias and shut down opposing views. I think more often than not, formal fallacies are misused and misapplied in informal debates, relying on over-gen
12.
Artificial Intelligence Confronts a 'Reproducibility' Crisis(wired.com)
2 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
13.
VC Boom That Backed World’s Most Valuable Internet Startups Has Lost Its Steam(forbes.com)
1 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
14.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
You’ve identified what everyone else can’t understand. Kudos. This is especially damaging to drivers that desire to drive their own vehicles and choose how much they want to drive. The proposed wages are way below what you should be taking
15.
Big Tech may be losing its allure for talented staff(ft.com)
1 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
16.
The rise of artificial intelligence comes with rising needs for power(marketwatch.com)
1 points by rollingdeep 7y ago|0 comments
17.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
>The outsourcing companies argued that the law would apply to them only if the American workers who were displaced by visa holders they hired had originally been their employees, not Disney’s. Judge Presnell was persuaded by that argumen
18.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
Not sure how you jump to “lump of labour fallacy” here when the article was discussing wage suppression. This trope is beyond tired and misused. Please stop spreading misinformation.
19.
by rollingdeep 7y ago
Please don’t post misinformation. Exponential growth (population or otherwise) is a tired economic trope. The frontier days are over, please update your views to modern times like the past 70 years or so where growth is much more limited th