roetlich

5 ms·

1.
by roetlich 2mo ago
Love the exclamation marks. So let's just use, for example, this definition: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ad-hominem Here it's a type of argument, and it's only sometimes a fallacy. Seems like this h
2.
by roetlich 2mo ago
Oh yes, I didn't clarify that I meant an argumentum ad hominem, which isn't the same thing as the informal fallacy of the same name. So yeah, I agree, this isn't directly fallacious.
3.
by roetlich 2mo ago
> if Andrew isn't trying to enter the discussion But he is. Both in the title, and in later half of the blog post, he directly enters that discussion. I'm not saying an ad hominem argument is always bad, but this clearly is one
4.
by roetlich 2mo ago
No, the discussion started with a the article from Bun, stating that rust has some technical advantages for them. The response from the Zig creator is a bunch of personal attacks directed at one guy, like calling him a stinky manager. All o
5.
by roetlich 3mo ago
Well, this seems like a very dangerous way of using AI. If you keep pushing until you get back an answer that makes sense to you, you might just get your own believes fed back to you.
6.
by roetlich 4mo ago
Who would have thought that git worktree is the technology of the year 2026?
7.
by roetlich 4mo ago
Great, now we need this with current data for modern governments
8.
by roetlich 5mo ago
Great idea, to include learning into the regular work. Can you explain how the lessons are generated? It looks like there are no pre-generated lessons, they are created on the fly by the AI. Wouldn't it be possible to write a skill or
9.
by roetlich 5mo ago
My Firefox doesn't accept your https cert. Maybe check that out?
10.
by roetlich 5mo ago
What does "done offline" mean? Otherwise you are limited by context window.
11.
by roetlich 6mo ago
"Managment" usually are office workers.
12.
by roetlich 7mo ago
> Does it continue if you agree to the warning? No, you can't "agree". > What if you ask about 9/11? It answers the question.
13.
by roetlich 8mo ago
Well, most interpreters use a compiler internally, for example to compile to byte code. The book explains that as well, so I'd recommend just reading it: https://craftinginterpreters.com/a-map-of-the-territory.html...
14.
by roetlich 8mo ago
Thanks, will fix! Haven't maintaineed the website in a bit :)
15.
by roetlich 8mo ago
https://till.red/ :)
16.
by roetlich 10mo ago
Very cool! Why was and the entire networking stack straight forward, but not HTTP (and TCP)? Could you take inspiration form other projects for things like DNS?
17.
by roetlich 10mo ago
Interesting! The article talks mostly about how this all worked, but rarely about what was actually discussed. Which opinions of the party do you like or support?
18.
by roetlich 11mo ago
> one door per day until it's Christmas eve That would be 24.
19.
by roetlich 1y ago
What? I think there must be some misunderstanding? I think deathanatos just wants an easy way to send files between computers when the internet is down, which seems decently reasonable.
20.
by roetlich 1y ago
Then don't turn it on?
21.
by roetlich 1y ago
Any comparison to Typst?
22.
by roetlich 1y ago
Unless you modify Redis, what do you want to share? You don't have to share any of your server code or anything. No reason to be so dramatic. :)
23.
by roetlich 1y ago
Or you could use C# and get all of those features.
24.
by roetlich 1y ago
This looks very cool, maybe I'll try this for risc-v if I have some time. I guess you could also use this to write RAW images, or other binary data.
25.
by roetlich 1y ago
Fair, thanks.
26.
by roetlich 1y ago
Oh, that makes more sense. Thank you! Is this linked list type then mostly meant to be used as an internal implementation detail, and not be exposed in a public API? Because if I see a function that takes a non-generic list I won't rea
27.
by roetlich 1y ago
Thank you, that answers all my questions.
28.
by roetlich 1y ago
Well I personally almost never use linked lists, don't like them. But Zig seems to think otherwise, they have two implementations in the standard library. I don't know much Zig, I just wanted to ask how to use the type that the ar
29.
by roetlich 1y ago
Okay, thanks for explaining more. > And it's typesafe: if you write invalid code the compiler will give you an error. One more question, if @fieldParentPtr("node", n) is typesafe and can get you a User, the compiler needs
30.
by roetlich 1y ago
This looks somewhat horrifying. How do I safely write a function that takes a linked list as a parameter?

More ›