rockwotj

16 ms·

1.
by rockwotj 12d ago
Sorry for spreading misinformation!
2.
by rockwotj 12d ago
> It sounds like transactions by default are required to be written to disk before completion They are yolo mode by default with periodic fsync and a big mutex around every reducer: https://strn.cat/posts/spacetime&#
3.
by rockwotj 1mo ago
hopefully it was produced by their own inference engine!
4.
by rockwotj 2mo ago
but according to Little’s law, if you improve latency, you also improve throughput, right? If I have the same number of CPU cores and they all can do their work in half the time they can double the number of requests now
5.
by rockwotj 2mo ago
9fs is better than NFSv3 but NFSv4 is a different beast and more powerful Honestly the biggest limitation is its quite a big protocol and can be complicated, but I don’t see any major advantages you could do yourself protocolwise over a cus
6.
by rockwotj 2mo ago
> Wouldn't 9fs/plan9fs be more suitable for this use case from my limited understanding though? Can you elaborate on why? NFS is really a great protocol with a lot of tricks to reduce round trips
7.
by rockwotj 2mo ago
author here! Glad you liked the post :) > Motivation for combining Chorus and SlateDB for NFS I work on an AI agent (tasklet) and we give every agent a linux machine. Having durable storage that is cheap, fast and multi-tenant is really
8.
by rockwotj 2mo ago
But this is model behavior and just a public issue tracker which claude code has just without code? I don’t see how it’s any different than https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code for these issues. I do appreciate th
9.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
Because it’s harder. It’s a stateful protocol and has a lot more features
10.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
Nothing wrong with that, but you should remove the “at rest in S3” footnote from the write latency on the frontpage of the website, because that is not what is measured
11.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
Yeah in this case the footnote to the write latency specifically says “at rest in S3”, which is what caused me to go look at the source. To be clear I have no problem with the ZeroFS of only flushing on fsync. I am very excited for object
12.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
The sub-millisecond writes with data in S3 is false and impossible. If you look at the benchmark the fsync is not timed, so this is just the latency of either the network or in kernel file operations depending on the mount settings
13.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
Oh of course all deepseek and glm are. Multiple people have seen GLM self report that it is claude, which makes it super obvious. I think the surprising thing is I expect flash to be a pure distillation and strictly worse quality but clearl
14.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
I have also found deepseek flash beat pro in some of my own internal evals for tasklet.ai it’s really surprising and I don’t understand it
15.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
> will finally fracture. If true, it will only be replaced with something else. With what is anyone’s guess.
16.
by rockwotj 3mo ago
I actually just started doing this by having Fable roleplay as Jeff Dean and to use Codex as Sanjay driving the implementation and have them go back and forth. Works really well and it’s cool to see AI pair program
17.
by rockwotj 4mo ago
This seems really great! I am a long time Bazel fan, but it’s not perfect, and I have always thought there was something simpler than bazel that would give a lot of these kinds of benefits. Having something that works for a hybrid rust&#x2F
18.
by rockwotj 5mo ago
IIRC (it’s been awhile) this was an optimization that was inspired by someone noticing all of Google spent a lot of time in vDSO using https://research.google/pubs/google-wide-profiling-a-continu... Google generally do
19.
by rockwotj 5mo ago
Related reading is absl’s linear approximation of gettime from cycle counters, which I thought is a neat trick: https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/blob/351086314d46e73d43...
20.
by rockwotj 5mo ago
> Production-grade 17 operation types. 40+ semantic validation rules. Auth, rate limiting, PostgreSQL storage. Man where in the LLM training data did the “production ready “ come from? That whole list screams AI. Humans want social proof
21.
by rockwotj 6mo ago
https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/datadog-time-series-foundatio... https://moment-timeseries-foundation-model.github.io/ https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07815 A friend at work used one to
22.
by rockwotj 6mo ago
Probably the better link: https://research.google/blog/a-decoder-only-foundation-model...
23.
by rockwotj 6mo ago
> which isn't saying that much I mean I also think this move doesn’t make sense, but I always find these type of comments interesting. Do people think they could do better in Mark’s shoes?
24.
by rockwotj 7mo ago
Or it’s compiled in the cloud?
25.
by rockwotj 7mo ago
One would think it must otherwise there are all these issues with compiling, signing tc if they don’t have xcode installed etc. I would guess it’s some webview wrapper with a layer to expose desktop app functionality
26.
by rockwotj 7mo ago
Fundamentally, the "guessing when its your turn thing" needs to be baked into the model. I think the full duplex mode that Moshi pioneered is probably where the puck is going to end up: https://arxiv.org/abs/2
27.
Tasklet Instant Apps(tasklet.ai)
3 points by rockwotj 7mo ago|1 comments
28.
by rockwotj 7mo ago
A category of SaaS companies are cooked in the age of AI - why not just have the perfect purpose built thing instead of fighting bloated enterprise software with a billion customizations and knobs that makes everything complicated?
29.
What If LLMs Could See Trust Boundaries?(rockwotj.com)
3 points by rockwotj 7mo ago|0 comments
30.
by rockwotj 7mo ago
I am sure they made a bid. The blog makes it sounds like he talked to multiple labs.

More ›