robjellinghaus

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by robjellinghaus 7mo ago

   Not Microsoft.
2. 2.▲
   by robjellinghaus 1y ago

   In my experience with Claude Code and Sonnet, it is absolutely possible to have architectural and design-oriented conversations about the work, at an entirely different and higher level than using a (formerly) high-level programming languag
3. 3.▲
   by robjellinghaus 1y ago

   Hindenburg indeed killed hydrogen blimps. Of everything else on your list, the disaster was in the minority. The space shuttle was the most lethal other item -- there are lots of cruise ships, oil rigs, nuke plants, and jet planes that have
4. 4.▲
   by robjellinghaus 1y ago

   I felt the same way until I tried Claude Code. Moving from an autocomplete-based workflow to a conversation-based workflow changed everything. I find traditional Copilot useless by comparison.
5. 5.▲
   by robjellinghaus 3y ago

   No worries, I didn't interpret your comment as belittlement. I agree the project was over-ambitious and overly complex, but it was also visionary and influential.
6. 6.▲
   by robjellinghaus 3y ago

   I was there (you'll find my name in the Wired article), and on the whole I would agree that Xanadu's reach far exceeded its grasp. Compared to the simplicity of the http protocol, Xanadu's complexity was high enough and its p