Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
robeym
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
robeym
19d ago
I think the entire purpose of the acquisition was just to buy a chunk of the market for their own models. Curious to see if Musk responds.
2.
▲
by
robeym
20d ago
Benchmarks and cost don't really help me understand how good a model actually is. Anyone have hands on experience working with the current newest models? What work did you do, and how did the model performance ?
3.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
So I'm guessing as a result of this, FAANG and similar companies are going to have free access while the little guy will be left out. Is there any concrete information on whether this would be an application process or perhaps for comp
4.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
I'm on 0.139.0 on Linux and my visible ~/.codex/logs are only about 129 MB. This makes me even more conservative on upgrading these tools every time they prompt me to. Better to let them get a few miles on them and see how th
5.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
My opinion is that the publicity can only help Cursor. I don't necessarily think SpaceX would make Cursor better. Copilot (which I view as a direct competitor to Cursor) has a huge structural advantage. I have several friends in variou
6.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Cursor was my first hands-on experience with AI. I didn't know much about getting set up with specific providers via API, and Cursor made it easy to pick any model, ask a question about some code, and get a clear suggested answer easil
7.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Great post. It was an amusing read, and quite the discovery! Good work, and great job documenting it.
8.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Unfortunate to see AI police as top comment on a good amusing post!
9.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Given how easy it was to get our own version of an AI service tool set up, I'm shocked to see a huge, capable company buying it's way into that functionality as opposed to using their large existing datasets to fine-tune an intern
10.
▲
Ask HN: How is your company getting cited by ChatGPT?
2 points
by
robeym
3mo ago
|
1 comments
11.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Ah yes the bait and switch. Didn't take long. Win some market share from unhappy AWS customers, hike the prices later
12.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
I think it felt more polished, otherwise they wouldn't have released it. Fable took more shortcuts, lied more, had stabilizing safeguards removed, and just did what it wanted more than other models.
13.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
PAX ERP. An AI-assisted ERP for small regulated/job shop manufacturers that have outgrown QuickBooks and can't afford (or take the time) to go through a traditional ERP implementation. PAX is the easiest ERP to pick up. Our core i
14.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Having used and watched others use Fable, it's clear to me that the standard of care for these models done by Anthropic pre-release was nothing like their previous releases. It seemed like shortcuts were taken to get it released. Maybe
15.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
It's good to see companies thoroughly testing these models in ways that could be used against them, but this should've been something Anthropic did more of before releasing it in the first place. The standard they used for releasi
16.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
Fable has been Anthropic's most ambitious and hopeful release. It makes me think Mythos isn't anything but Opus with certain guardrails removed. Very interesting. Hoping we'll see some quick refinements to it
17.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
It's been amusing to watch the AI trend of increasing unusual tool uses. Fable easily takes the cake. I learn a lot more terminal commands thanks to it!
18.
▲
Building an AI-Friendly Company, Just in Case AI Takes over the World
(paxerp.com)
1 points
by
robeym
3mo ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
Show HN: I generated 235 system docs in a day using GPT-5.5
(paxerp.com)
4 points
by
robeym
3mo ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
For PAX ERP. It'll be read by both humans and llms. "Paxy AI" will be the primary reader, which is the AI support tool in the system. When users ask it a question about how to do something, it'll answer based on the tech
21.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
AI impacts so much. So many white collar chores just get obliterated with AI. Legal & regulatory docs, production planning, sales materials, etc. Just yesterday I used AI to generate 235 new system docs based on our codebase, and added
22.
▲
by
robeym
3mo ago
That woodworking idea is great. It's just a hobby for me as well but after long days of desk work where moving fast is rewarded, it's great to work slowly on a wood project with my hands. I tried listing a couple things on Faceboo
23.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
Fun read! This is a good story to share. I spent over a year building a complex SaaS product for a narrow market, but it was something I personally needed and was interested in. It was a second full-time job as a solo developer, but the cha
24.
▲
GitHub Incident Again
(githubstatus.com)
2 points
by
robeym
4mo ago
|
2 comments
25.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests
26.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
I think quality experience and personal values are more important than engineer cost. I've seen so many shortcuts taken on outsourced work these past few years. AI also loves shortcuts. The combination of the two is not worth the cost
27.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
I don’t think we should be discouraging people from buying homes. In a healthy market, the goal should be more households owning the homes they live in, not more homes being accumulated by investors and non-owner-occupant buyers. The mistak
28.
▲
A trial user told us our ERP workflow felt disconnected. They were right
(paxerp.com)
1 points
by
robeym
4mo ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
I was in the same boat, moving my max subscription to Codex instead of Claude, with a Claude Design project going. I was under the impression that Design was pro plans only, so I downloaded basically everything before cancelling. It could b
30.
▲
by
robeym
4mo ago
I think progressing as humans is something to be proud of. I care less about who gets credit and more about what we can now do. I also do not think this makes people less capable of solving hard problems. The bar just moves up. More people
More ›