robertc

6 ms·

1.
by robertc 3y ago
Most screen readers ignore hidden elements IIRC.
2.
by robertc 3y ago
Possibly the svg element was inline, so sitting on the text baseline rather than the limits of the container element?
3.
by robertc 15y ago
No, he just said 5% had an invalid header, no claims were made about how many had valid headers. And unless he's actually audited any of the websites to see if what they're claiming in their P3P policies corresponds with how they actually
4.
by robertc 15y ago
It's really unbelievable... It's not really that unbelievable: Microsoft is berating Google for sending invalid P3P headers and this paper describes that Microsoft is sending invalid P3P headers. Microsoft does not always fully comply wi
5.
by robertc 15y ago
Where does P3P allow me to manage this trust relationship you say it's based on?
6.
by robertc 15y ago
I think live.com does (or did) do it. See page 8, second column of the CMU paper in this reddit comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/py9h5/now_google...
7.
by robertc 15y ago
Because if you don't allow people to bypass the privacy controls a significant chunk of the web stops working. For instance there's at least one well known WiFi hotspot service in the UK for which the block 3rd party cookies option in Fire
8.
by robertc 15y ago
It really doesn't matter what MS does; they get bashed either way. Then probably best not to draw attention to yourself by, for example, having a VP make a blog post about it.
9.
by robertc 15y ago
Firefox dropped support for P3P in Firefox 3 because "p3p isn't an effective way to establish trust with a site. it's a one-way system; anyone can say they're the good guy." See item b: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417800#c
10.
by robertc 15y ago
I've had ICS on my Nexus S for a few months now and I've not seen issues like that. I'm just using the standard Google image (AFAIK, my brother did the upgrade for me - Android 4.0.3, kernel 3.0.8-gb55e9ac). I do see a lot of battery drai
11.
by robertc 15y ago
It depends on whether his violation of the TOS involved him stealing data he shouldn't be allowed to have.