rob_c

13 ms·

1.
by rob_c 21d ago
Yes, but how else do they plan to announce they have achieved it without 1984 word management/control and polluting the training pool so badly that future trained models agree?
2.
by rob_c 21d ago
Tbf "ai" probably helped him write the guff rather than improve anything.
3.
by rob_c 24d ago
Its like your training an organic llm...
4.
by rob_c 27d ago
No, they're realists. Plus show me an off the shelf solution to MDM that exists in the Linux space? (Not too mention an easy to buy consumer devices which supports suspend/resume correctly in 2026, not even Windows can do that any
5.
by rob_c 1mo ago
There's also a difference between treatment and cure but we call it all a "vaccine" now (I prefer the transitional OED definition from pre 2019). We've already entered 1984s use of good speak especially around healthcare
6.
by rob_c 1mo ago
And that same problem leading to him is the same reason why we have 3rd world diseases coming back...
7.
by rob_c 1mo ago
Given the recent outbreaks of diseases we should have already eliminated here (for other reasons that "we shouldn't discuss")... I view this as a wonderful "they don't report in and the coroner doesn't check&qu
8.
by rob_c 3mo ago
There are extremists who claimed the ocean would be destroyed by acid rain, oil would run out by 2020 and co2 levels would push the temps to 25+C in the UK for most of the year. None of these things have happened but these people were still
9.
by rob_c 3mo ago
Yeah that article is missing a very major point that immigration in the UK hasn't meant assimilation or a coherent mixing of cultures as people want or may have observed at times. The problems in the UK are actually focused around stic
10.
by rob_c 3mo ago
No, that's the quality of candidates. I wish I was joking as a PhD holder for only 15yr. A lot of skill of is getting bled into the private sector because getting the PhD in a lot of regions doesn't mean the step up it used to. A
11.
by rob_c 3mo ago
Those who can use it better, those who can't out who cheat are (for now) let down by obviously cheap and slightly crappy models. The worry is in ~5yr time when the generic models catch up to this level (basic undergrad mind) that we ne
12.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> You pay red hat for compliance reasons You may, have you heard of docker?
13.
by rob_c 4mo ago
So why else do we pay someone to package and certify/verify open source projects? This is absolutely 90++% of what should be RedHats core day job.
14.
by rob_c 4mo ago
Again. "AI" for what it is is just basic "ML". And say it with me ML has no form of agency. This is a human screwing up and blaming their tools. Nothing to see move on. Unfortunately there will be both the LLM crowd evan
15.
by rob_c 4mo ago
I'm fairly sure the FPGA space is big enough there are alternate products for most of the offerings
16.
by rob_c 4mo ago
Think academic and small companies who don't pay for support opening corner case issues all the time publicly. They want none of the complex support unless you pay (reasonable imo). And for those who forget RHEL for instance has to pay
17.
by rob_c 4mo ago
But you just showed you have deep pockets and they think they can get you to open it again every year for the rest of time. Xilinx was never positioned that it made sense for them to open it up. If/when it gets run into the ground by A
18.
by rob_c 4mo ago
Or the stupid stop being so loud
19.
by rob_c 4mo ago
No. Not at all. The simulations were based on old data with the artificial cut off. The particles were and are much much smaller. Please don't recite rhetoric and do some reading. And frankly I'm saddened that you're arguing
20.
by rob_c 4mo ago
Global fact most died from a related underlying disease and COVID simply hastened on the process. Actually killed from just this is way below the 1M mark globally. Also we've now reached vitD in kids cereals and butter so you know, we
21.
by rob_c 4mo ago
Water + heat + sieve Unless you have industrial pollutants in which case you also have someone to blame... We didn't get this far as a species being that ignorant
22.
by rob_c 4mo ago
The alternative being to tell your neighbour to tell their neighbour to stop defacating in the river or you'll stop paying their bills to bring the analogy closer to home...
23.
by rob_c 4mo ago
So your position is 0.01 Vs 0.001 and given error bars bigger than that you're arguing that I'm clearly wrong to say 0.1 is wrong... Slow clap...
24.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> the anti-mask wackos Well thank you for your service to stupidity. The only measure of worth was actual social distancing which was quickly admonished by the pointless mask arguments as nauseum. No, there is no science good to bad to
25.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> some nuanced point it's not nuanced to point out a very large statement which at the time was very VERY anti-trumpian and pro ultra-left, lest not forget "hug a tourist", "lets change the popular naming conventions
26.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> you guys I'm a wonderful citizen of heir u-turn starmer unfortunately so plenty of wanting to clear the waterways here :P
27.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> With what money? There's a reason they're dependent on USAID. How much does BASIC hygiene cost it's like manners. It's education (which is more than well funded at a "throw cash at it problem". > we jus
28.
by rob_c 4mo ago
> Why should we expect the US to step up? Le all-mighty dollar, it tastes best when given freely no? > It's almost as if the double standard is off the charts. I agree. I love how the same people will typically call for US withdr
29.
by rob_c 4mo ago
It's healthy to remain sceptical of all information, pointing out a very widely blindly trusted organisation has serious problems which means this trust and faith placed in it is blind is NOT "an enemy of my enemy" situation.
30.
by rob_c 4mo ago
which is the statement being made to cancel the money since after X years there are almost zero deliverables rather than being the a&e dept for the world, in countries where leaders have fleets of sports cars whilst their people die of

More ›