rkuodys

5 ms·

1.
by rkuodys 5d ago
The first question that comes to my mind - what is the accountability of Open ai? What is the punishment for them for not being able to control their agents. Is this, together with previous cases, sets a precedent that "if agent does i
2.
by rkuodys 8d ago
What leads you to assume the physical work would be automated. Are there any profession thay has been replaced/automatedninto oblivion that requires more than one physical step (except for elevator operator). Because even new construct
3.
by rkuodys 8d ago
Isn't nature doing exactly that every single day?
4.
by rkuodys 22d ago
But something can be valuable to somebody without hurting you. For example if you participate in study as a member of control group. There is no impact to your life and huge benefit to whoever is producing the research. Similarly waste coll
5.
by rkuodys 22d ago
Is't the fact that data is valuable for somebody, does not mean that it has a cost (price) for me? Spending data is definitely valuable for seller / corporation to know what to produce. I, on the other hand, cannot get money by sa
6.
by rkuodys 23d ago
As far as I understand this is broken incentive system. Waiter can rarely make restaurant experience better - food is dependent on the kitchen - and it only worse make it worse - bad attitude, spitting in food etc. So from customer PoV, it
7.
by rkuodys 25d ago
Company can optimise for the benchmark (profit) while worsening the product. I think thebterm enshitification is used there. It appears that AI got it too
8.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
While it can be true for technical state of the system, you dont have the business decision log, nor you have the intention, and most importantly - you need someone to assume responsibility for this mini system. While it can be easier for
9.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
I expect full circle on this one. Short term - many enthusiasts build stuff. I can fully imagine someone in a given company creating something over the weekend and persuading manager to adopt the system. However, 6 months pass, the person n
10.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
But the point is you will never have the best barista all the time l. Unless you are 0.0001 % of population who can afford personal barista to follow you anywhere, you accept whoever is serving coffe at the corner shop. And for a machine t
11.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
I am not sure if I'm ignorant or have too much self esteem, but in cases where domain is not my expertise I try to cross challenge using different models to get less-biased and hopefully more correct insights.
12.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
I think there is negative bias. The counterpoint being that with code you can test input vs output. With foreign language you cannot. Programmed system, either computes what you want or it doesnt. For Spanish you either have a person who ca
13.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
Isn't that the story of <any> technology? When the coffee machines first came to be, Barista was definitely a better option. However, through the evolution, in many cases today machine does better job than barista.
14.
by rkuodys 2mo ago
I think that is the problem with concentrated markets. You can do whatever and younare actually never "punished" by the market. Ie market htpothesis does not work
15.
by rkuodys 3mo ago
I'm pretty sure the personality tests are created specifically for the reason that a single person can have fundamentally (or conflicting) beliefs about himself in a matter of minutes. You can say "I am honest person" and the
16.
by rkuodys 5mo ago
What is the point on Musk you are making? The monetary success does not neccesserily correlate to the common good they have created. In case of Musk there is a lot of governement subsidies, lots of market manipulation and false claim s. So
17.
by rkuodys 6mo ago
I think its somewhat comparable to cutting grass in the cities. It was manual labour first. Then there were teactors. Now robots join in - does that mean that personel cutting grass is obsolete? No , you need all of them. That means that ci
18.
by rkuodys 6mo ago
Isnt' that what old-school software did for many years? It used to take jobs, just not from developers. If you implement software that takes accounting from 10 people to 2, 8 just got fired. If you have Support solution helping one sup
19.
by rkuodys 7mo ago
My feeling was the same reading. If you give a task to a junior and he wipes out a database in production - it is not a fault of a Junior, it is your own fault that he was able to do it.
20.
Ask HN: For solopreneurs – how to you solve architecture?
1 points by rkuodys 7mo ago|0 comments
21.
by rkuodys 7mo ago
Isnt that point kind of the counterpoint to the AI-first narrative. With standard, human driven operations its true about opportunity costs. What we are told is that AI will replace human, essentially saying that opportunity cost becomes ca
22.
by rkuodys 7mo ago
Can I ask you if you consider that AI changes anything about that? Since I'm embarking on the same boat, my dream is a team of AI which supports and ensures business continuity while Im on vacation or "OOO" otherwise.
23.
by rkuodys 9mo ago
I am honestly curious about your point on productivity boost. Are you saying that you can write tests at the same speed as AI can? Or is it the point that tests written by AI is of much lower quality that is not worth using them? I am at th
24.
by rkuodys 11mo ago
I think it highly depends on your perception on what is your job. If programmer is only the code-writer - then it is reasonable to agree with the post. If on the other hand the developer is problem solver - well it just changes what proble
25.
by rkuodys 11mo ago
Facing similar issue with monitoring part of executions. What is your solution if I may as - have you taken smth of the shelf and extended to your needs or did you built from the ground up everything?
26.
by rkuodys 1y ago
While it's definitely interesting comparison, I would say the that key thing is that genius is limited in scope. What I mean by that is given any single genius - we might agree that he is one on subject X but not on subject Y. With AGI
27.
by rkuodys 1y ago
I actually built the app myself. And for one simple reason - recently started learning to better plan my time. Started with paper version, and up to 5 most important task - my personal goal is to have consistency rather than squeeze every m
28.
by rkuodys 1y ago
I'm reading this and kind of stuck on the 4th. I have a printer though not much of 3D designer. How do one get 3D models for parts that is suitable with SparkFun electronics?
29.
by rkuodys 1y ago
How do you protect agains "professionals" abusing the system. So maybe thats not relevant in USA but I see potential in our communities that smaller repair shops or construction contractor would come and use tools disproportionall
30.
by rkuodys 1y ago
What I see LLMs at this point is simplified input and output solutions with reduced barriers of entry. So application could become more widespread. Now that I think of it, maybe this AI era is not electricity, but rather GUI - like the time

More ›