righttoolforjob

6 ms·

1.
by righttoolforjob 2y ago
If we assume the hypothesis that the current officials are russian plants, then since F.B.I already is being taken over and diverting resources away from foreign threats then this action can be either made to A) make it appear as if control
2.
by righttoolforjob 2y ago
Scrum is moronic and has proven itself worse and worse over the past 20 years. It started out with good intent but today it is either merely not-in-the-way or horribly dysfunctional. There is a small, small percentage of projects where it m
3.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Perhaps? But unless I'd report directly to Elon, I might not want to work in his organizations. Amazon is clearly a whack place for many and there is no shortage of horrible stories from Elon's companies. Elon is clearly a kid who
4.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
simple: there is no such set.
5.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
I think you meant "separate".
6.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
What do you mean? That's the entire point of talking about things.
7.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Well, take a car as an example. The question is not what you use a car for, but rather how the car is built.
8.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
I've used it for about 25 years and still love it. Wish you would port it to Windows as well!
9.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
They're likely irrelevant anyway. We're all shouting into the void.
10.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
This is nothing like a nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb doesn't choose to explode itself, nor can it replicate itself.
11.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
That's besides the point. The argument still holds. We don't want to find ourselves with our foot on an exploding mine before we stop walking across the minefield. At that point it is too late.
12.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
What is the limit of intelligence? What limits the human intelligence? How many more times intelligent would an AGI have to be to have the capacity to take over the world?
13.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Nobody says that it necessarily follows, but it's a quite trivial step once you have the AGI, hence pointless that you bring up it as an argument.
14.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Who said it followed? That's a strawman. To dumb it down even further for you, I guess... There are brains, therefore there can be created an artificial super-brain. Artificial super-brain might have goals which don't align with h
15.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Nothing hand-wavy about it. The article that this thread is based on provides the evidence, and you are refuting it. I am refuting your refutation. My experience aligns exactly with the article, that nothing really got better, and especiall
16.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
What a horrible argument from this guy, whoever he is. And ending with a whataboutism just for the sake of it. I hope nobody regards him as some authority, because he is quite unintelligent and seemingly unable to form proper arguments.
17.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
I can't find a flaw in this argument. That is a bit scary actually.
18.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
> It's not exactly built-in obsolescence, so much as being built to cost. How do you know this? Seems completely implausible. Source please.
19.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
The regular consumer, like us, don't give a rats ass about the technology behind the light, we just want them to work well. The light is much, much worse than incandescents for the typical consumer. That's what the article is abou
20.
by righttoolforjob 3y ago
Hi, also European here. Everything the article complains about is true. The light from LEDs is significantly worse, even in Europe.
21.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
> The only thing you need here is knowledge about how the primitives work and how they compose. That's really the only challenge. > I can explain by comparing it to art. Artistry is hard and artistry is basically the same thing a
22.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
I can't argue with your points about not having evidence, but I refuse to brush it off as "merely anecdotal" as well. > I think of system design as something that is tediously hard. It's not something that requires a
23.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Even though there isn't a formal theory, there definitely is a big difference between a person capable of doing good system design and one who isn't. I don't think all people are capable of becoming a systems designer or arch
24.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
You've misunderstood the quoted paragraph. They are saying that services that aren't on the corporate network behind the VPN or PEP should not require being routed through the corporate network to access, ideally.
25.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Except, you can combine VPNs with other tech. There is nothing exclusionary about it. It's defense-in-depth which, tada, NIST recommends.
26.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
It is definitely in line with US foreign policy to lessen their dependence on Russia.
27.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Consuming is the worst. The Internet is a toxic cesspool, for the most part. Having an account and interacting with friends would be one of the few exceptions, and maybe learning some stuff now and then.
28.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Corruption? Scam? I don't know which universal theory of law you are talking about, but if you are actively lying or hiding information to further your own interests then that surely could and should be illegal. You'll have to con
29.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Slightly related. The Reddit subforum for Bitcoin is managed by people supporting the scam and they very actively promote it and will ban any opposition. I think that should be illegal.
30.
by righttoolforjob 4y ago
Clearly not written by anyone familiar with the topic :)

More ›