rf_physics

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rf_physics 8d ago

   My initial read of this > Pretty much all of math and science history is basically this pattern again and again. I'm sure all of that was rude as well. was that you were trying to suggest that it wasn't. It seems we actually sh
2. 2.▲
   by rf_physics 8d ago

   Apologies if this is against the rules, but could I ask if you have some background in scientific research (maybe you could elaborate lightly on topics you've worked on)? From my perspective, this practice is quite bad mannered, unusua
3. 3.▲
   by rf_physics 9d ago

   They were working on it for almost a year, and Buckmaster has evidently been interested in Navier-Stokes for a while. This seems to be more of an innocent collaboration between two researchers than a strong company PR effort. Maybe Anthropi
4. 4.▲
   by rf_physics 1mo ago

   This follow up idea is a fun one! Not likely I'll have to be teaching a course like this again, but I will suggest it to some people I know.
5. 5.▲
   by rf_physics 4mo ago

   I feel like there's an overly negative vibe to this response when it just seems like rubber duck debugging - I would assume the user isn't trying to argue like how you might have to argue specs, but is merely trying to clarify the
6. 6.▲
   by rf_physics 4mo ago

   Thanks for sharing this. It's unfortunate that the more honest framing about the value of mathematics that he suggests is going to be really, really hard because of all the pitfalls and agendas he mentioned here. I can only hope when t
7. 7.▲
   by rf_physics 4mo ago

   pretty minor since the rest are fine but your linkedin link is broken