revvx

17 ms·

1.
by revvx 7y ago
"Multirepo" is the term I see the most
2.
by revvx 7y ago
> My previous job was doing microservices for frontend and current job is doing monorepos. I prefer monorepo for frontend because: I think you're misusing the term "monorepo", no? Monorepo is just a technique for organiz
3.
by revvx 7y ago
Nope. Not even for safe (image, music, etc) files. And even if I had, PKG files don't install themselves on macOS, they open the installer interface, AFAIK. EDIT: And, as I mentioned, the file was downloaded by some Zoom client, not by
4.
by revvx 7y ago
I think I found out: there's a daemon process that I somehow missed the first time around. Deleting the .app file as instructed is not enough. This StackExchange reply [1] showed me how to solve it, at least on macOS. [1] https:/
5.
by revvx 7y ago
This is weird, I had Zoom installed a long time ago but uninstalled according to their instructions [1]. I'm a macOS user. As soon as I clicked that link, the client downloaded a PKG file, installed itself and launched itself without a
6.
by revvx 7y ago
Avoiding the use of reduce/fold is a good thing even in teams with more experience in functional programming. The problem is not reduce itself, it's the code that uses it.
7.
by revvx 7y ago
> After a year or so of trial and error, we have pretty much stopped using reduce I see Reduce (along with recursion itself) as the equivalent of a "low-level" construct in functional programming. It is a great building block
8.
by revvx 7y ago
> For instance, Safari doesn't allow localstorage while in incognito It does allow (at least in the version I'm using), but doesn't persist the data between sessions. Which is the whole point of Icognito mode.
9.
by revvx 7y ago
IME the thing that matters the most is focus, both on the micro and macro level. It's way too easy to get caught on things that won't make an iota of difference in your future. Focus is the first thing that goes out the window a
10.
by revvx 7y ago
> Don't invite someone and when they arrive tell them they are not welcome to speak. Post a list of speakers before, get your feedback and live with your decisions. The speaker was notified in April 25. The conference will happen in
11.
by revvx 7y ago
> It does not really seem that he tried to talk to the person whose talk was cancelled (and who had probably already bought plane tickets, etc). You missed that as well. He and another person of his group reached out to her beforehand. H
12.
by revvx 7y ago
I watched this unfold on Twitter, and you're misrepresenting the situation. The people removed from the conference have a history of disruption and harassment in the community. They were removed because of previous behavior that the or
13.
by revvx 7y ago
The conference organizer denied a speaker position in a conference. All that happened in private. The person and a third-party engaged (allegedly) in doxxing and public shaming. Even if the conference organizer was in the wrong, there'
14.
by revvx 7y ago
I watched this unfold on Twitter, and it was a third-party related to the woman that decided to "out" themselves. It's not an easy position for a conference organizer to be in.
15.
by revvx 7y ago
I watched this unfold on twitter, and in the organizer's defense, he only addressed the situation and the culprits after those people started a public discussion regarding the ban. The organizer was defending himself. It's a diffi
16.
by revvx 7y ago
The answer here confirms what you said: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=500807
17.
by revvx 7y ago
Probably because 2003 requires Flash!
18.
by revvx 7y ago
I think you have answered your own question: it's one less thing to worry about in your stack. If you're targeting modern evergreen browsers you already have a lot of modern features at your disposal, including ES6 modules, async&
19.
by revvx 7y ago
After checking the archived content on [1], as posted by Updtrenda, it seems that it was just a bunch of HTML files indeed. If this is really the case, I don't see why they can't just put it on a Torrent and distribute it. Or even
20.
by revvx 7y ago
This is similar to Brazilian banks too. Both public and private. They stoped using ActiveX in the 00s but then started requiring the user to install some rootkit-like security software that was nearly impossible to uninstall and was probabl
21.
by revvx 7y ago
For those curious about how the website looked before the removal, here's a Web Archive link: http://web.archive.org/web/20181122020124/https://kaiserpape...
22.
by revvx 7y ago
The parent asked about Low End Stock, not about Netlify
23.
by revvx 7y ago
IME: It really depends. It's not a silver bullet, you HAVE to measure and calculate [1]. The pricing is transparent, so it's more predictable. My experience with single-function lambdas in JS was very positive, because they'r
24.
“Strong Opinions Loosely Held” Might Be the Worst Idea in Tech(blog.glowforge.com)
17 points by revvx 7y ago|10 comments
25.
by revvx 7y ago
> The "write-raw-SQL-with-raw-strings" approach has one serious issue -- sql-injections. Nobody has advocated writing "raw SQL with raw strings" in years. The valid way of using Raw SQL is using prepared statements an
26.
by revvx 7y ago
Dapper is similar and it got some traction in the .NET community. https://github.com/StackExchange/Dapper
27.
by revvx 7y ago
> For example, manual memory management is a detail that should almost always be someplace else because it isn't relevant to solving the problem at hand. So we did this with garbage collectors. However, sometimes we need this detail
28.
by revvx 7y ago
All IMO: > However, I've never seen a convincing and objective description of clear code. I take "clever code" to mean "code that looks pretty on surface the but requires the reader to dig in in order to understand th
29.
by revvx 7y ago
I agree 100%. In my experience, loops and recursion are lower level constructs that should ideally be used only in libraries (map, filter, limit, sum, distinct, etc [1]) and in hot code paths (for optimization). Kevlin Henney makes a good o
30.
by revvx 7y ago
Yeah. I always see the De Morgan's Law being used to make the code look prettier or look less complicated. I'd say it's objectively prettier most of the time, but unfortunately that's exactly what introduces double negat

More ›