reveriedev

5 ms·

1.
by reveriedev 2mo ago
The models perform badly without guidance but we've found the guidance doesn't need a human in the loop (at least for this task). You can distill what makes a good wiki, what information should go in etc. and the models are good e
2.
by reveriedev 2mo ago
We've found Opus/Gpt are really bad at technical writing. We've found ways around this by having guidelines like https://www.openalmanac.org/ai-patterns-to-avoid.md , which have worked quite well for us. Under
3.
by reveriedev 2mo ago
We’re working on Linux/Windows support right now. Mac was the easiest to setup for us since that’s the machine we code on. What OS do you use?
4.
Ask HN: How do you maintain context across your coding sessions?
1 points by reveriedev 2mo ago|2 comments
5.
Show HN: Almanac – A self-updating wiki from your files(usealmanac.com)
2 points by reveriedev 2mo ago|0 comments
6.
by reveriedev 2mo ago
Back in the medieval age of 2025, I used frameworks like PydanticAI and LangGraph to build agents. Getting those agent systems to behave reliably was often annoying and tricky. Claude Code and Codex have since become capable general-purpose
7.
Show HN: CodeAlmanac – Self-updating wiki for your coding agent (local, Apache)(github.com)
8 points by reveriedev 2mo ago|0 comments
8.
by reveriedev 10mo ago
Good question. All profiles are free to view and share. We own the content and it can't be used for commercial purposes without explicit permission
9.
Show HN: The Almanac – Generate Wikipedia-style biographies of anyone(thealmanac.ai)
2 points by reveriedev 10mo ago|2 comments