Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
revasm
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
revasm
12y ago
Not a lie: I have never encountered the name Lexi before. I would have assumed it to be a made-up pseudonym. Or a reference to a post-modern sci-fi / futuristic book. If it's short for "Alexis," which is a claim you edit
2.
▲
by
revasm
12y ago
It doesn't scale, as the above spec points out. Pinning could be used to eliminate CAs (as most people initially expect) but this isn't viable at the moment. The specification, which proposes a method to validate the certificate c
3.
▲
by
revasm
12y ago
Public key pinning seems to be heading in a direction that relies on the current CA model. For example, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-20 , or https://code.google.com/p
4.
▲
by
revasm
12y ago
This error is caused by a bug[1] present on outdated versions of Linux (typically exhibited by DD-WRT and Tomato routers) and can also be fixed by upgrading to OpenWRT. Or, if that is not an option, by creating an ip6tables rule: ip6tab
5.
▲
by
revasm
12y ago
Full instructions for reference. Run: wget http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nss/libnss3{_3.16.3-1ubuntu1_amd64,-1d_3.16.3-1ubuntu1_amd64,-nssdb_3.16.3-1ubuntu1_all}.deb sudo dpkg
6.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
> the passwords themselves would still be gpg encrypted, thus safe, but the repository will leak names of all websites and userIDs. Consider encrypting the filenames with Fuse+EncFS. This flaw is pretty huge elsewise; it's why I cha
7.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
The problem with in-browser password management is that the attacker does not need to escape the browser. Code injection (via XSS or a browser exploit) into a running extension is likely easier than defeating the seccomp-IPC implementation
8.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
No: Note: The Strict-Transport-Security header is ignored by the browser when your site is accessed using HTTP; this is because an attacker may intercept HTTP connections and inject the header or remove it. When your site is access
9.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
I'm quite stumped why there aren't more good password tools. Pass, vim-gnupg, and SublimeGPG are all I've found. The application managers are atrocious -- not only the UIs but data format interoperability as well. Browser man
10.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
Yeah. It could be problematic. Then again, 6to4/6in4 tunneling is fairly straightforward: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IPv6_tunnelbrokers . Binding to a backup IPv4 port is another option.
11.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
I connect to many SSH servers that aren't under my control. It's pretty annoying to remember an arbitrary SSH port for my own. Binding to IPv6-only is more effective at reducing log spam: IP scanning 2^128 addresses is impractical
12.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
That was an unfortunate example. The widen() in this case is absolutely unnecessary. The author even recommends using the L prefix for UTF-16 string literals inside of Windows API calls (but not on other platforms, where wchar_t isn't
13.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
The parent poster is talking about static linking against a third-party LGPL library, not your own library. In such a case, failing to provide the complete source code, or the original compilation dependencies ( .o, .a, .so) and the bu
14.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
The main security benefit of click-to-play plugin schemes is not to question the user about the security of an object, which is unknown in most cases anyway, but to prevent accidental drive-by loading and other annoying (and risky) usage. C
15.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
At a minimum you'll need gstreamer1.0 and gst-plugins-ugly[1]. Perhaps gst-libav[2] would be an alternative to plugins-ugly. OT: Check out http://mpv.io/ . It's a forked mplayer2 with native support for libva:
16.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
I was under the impression that banal grammar corrections are frowned upon here on HN, because they do nothing to further the topic or encourage interesting discussion. It's one of the reasons why Reddit is so tedious.
17.
▲
by
revasm
13y ago
Is the gender of said author supposed to be curious or worthy of attention? I'm not intending to be impolite, but this is the third time in several days that HN posters have brusquely corrected a gender pronoun in relation to a submiss