Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
respondo2134
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
respondo2134
10mo ago
except (like it or not) students are in direct competition with each other. Unique assessments would be impossible to defend the first time a student claimed your "unfair" test cost them a job, scholarship or other competitive opp
2.
▲
by
respondo2134
10mo ago
honest q: what would it look like from your perspective if someone worked in entirely different tools and then only moved their finished work to google docs at the end?
3.
▲
by
respondo2134
10mo ago
you're missing out on the false positives though; catching 80% of cheaters might be acceptable but 20% false positives (not the same thing as 20% of the class) would not be acceptable. AI generated content and plagarism are completely
4.
▲
by
respondo2134
10mo ago
no, you multiply their result by .8 to account for the "uncertainty"! /s
5.
▲
by
respondo2134
10mo ago
Except the power imbalance: position, experience, social, etc. meant that the vast majority just took the zero and never complained or challenged the prof. Sounds like your typical out-of-touch academic who thought they were super clever.
6.
▲
by
respondo2134
11mo ago
this would be an incredibly tough play. We've seen few success stories, and even when the product is good building the business around them has often failed. Most of the consumer plays are terrible products with weak execution and no r
7.
▲
by
respondo2134
11mo ago
but with 10x or 100x the chutzpah
8.
▲
by
respondo2134
11mo ago
it's notable that there is no talk about defining what exactly AGI is - or even spelling out the three letter acronym - because that doesn't serve his narative. He wants the general public to equate human intelligence with current
9.
▲
by
respondo2134
11mo ago
He mayy be out front because he's the best PR face for this, but make no mistake there is massive collusion amongst all the players to inflte this bubble. Across MS, Oracle, AWS, OpenAI, Anthropic, NVidia and more all I see is a pair o
10.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
it's not just the cost of the vaccine roll-out though, you need test on your target demo and since these are healthy people the bar is very high. If the demographic (like males over 45) shows very little involvement in the infection ve
11.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
this seems highly unlikely. Almost all of the software we're discussing in this context has little or no resources behind it. No lawyers are going to sue an OSS developer because there's no payday.
12.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
Reductio ad Absurdum may be what you're thinking of, but Straw Man might also apply. Funny enough the responder didn't actually do what you said. They stated of the 600+ dependencies they counted there was only one they felt comfo
13.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
yeah, I typically start any substantial development work with getting things up to date so you're not building on something you'll find out is already broken when you do get around to that painful upgrade.
14.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
this seems to me to be trading one problem that might happen for one that is guaranteed: a very painful upgrade. Maybe you only do it once in a while but it will always suck.
15.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
>> and keeping them to well-known and trustworthy (security-wise) creators. The true threat here isn't the immediate dependency though, it's the recursive supply chain of dependencies. "trustworthy" doesn't m
16.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
what's the point of listing almost-but-not-all competing pronouns? How does that help someone respect their desired choice if "they're all good"?
17.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
I'm sick of people who cry "fire" but then follow up with "but, hey, I'm no fireman". WHAT is the alternative? What are you doing to realize it? We don't need anymore more specialists who focus on pointi
18.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
This is the Gavin Belson strategy to starve Pied Piper of distributed computing experts; nobody get's to work on his Signature Edition Box 3!
19.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
My observations (Canada, bigger city): The LP people you see (ie in "uniform") are often visible minorities, often women. They're positioned to remind you "we're watching!" not pursue any action. At best they&#
20.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
self-checkout at a grocery store is so maddening. There are enough edge cases (discounted items, multiples, lack of barcodes, special deals) to make it painful if you have anything more than a few staples. And I'm sure it's also p
21.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
IPOs are a really tough path, and can significantly alter the business. I'd hesitate to hold up the big one for this year as vindication for her entire approach. The vast majority of growth tech companies are not going to go public, bu
22.
▲
by
respondo2134
1y ago
struggling to create the organic interactions you had in-person? Here's a reomte process you can mandate and measure to ensure everyone is casually interacting in the correct, company-approved way!
23.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
one line that is crossed is putting others at risk or pulling them into their actions. I can't think of many scenarios where I'd support involuntary commitment when it was just the individual and their actions.
24.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
a killer feature of Sheets is querying web-based databases for adhoc reporting. You can do this lots of ways including Excel, but sheets was early and makes it very easy. I've saved so much development effort (in Excel or elsewhere) ju
25.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
I get what you're saying, and agree with lots of it, but most of the time things built in Excel are not for programmers, usually have no maintenance budgeted, and often are built by non-developers. To extend your analogy too far, Excel
26.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
I think people conflate Excel the product with workflows that can be solved with Excel. Lots of tools like sheets and even numbers can do the latter, but nothing since Lotus competed with the former. So if you've never used Excel, you
27.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
exactly. The most charitable way to look at this is Israel targeted a handful fewer bystanders than a terrorist attack. I can't imagine anyone thinking longer-term strategy thought thought this was a good idea.
28.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
I don't see this as a smart move (let alone strategy) in any time frame. As a third-party observer greatly removed from the conflict I used to view Israel as an island under attack from terrorists. Now I'm struggling to see the di
29.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
>> To the parent: prefer that you hold opinions like this to yourself. it seems weirdly inconsistent that you expect people to hear your voice as you try and shut down another expressing a viewpoint with which you don't agree. Yo
30.
▲
by
respondo2134
2y ago
for those increasingly rare times you want to print an image it's great too.
More ›