replooda

9 ms·

1.
by replooda 5mo ago
> theres some questionable quality content in the book, but lets be fair 4.5k pages is hard to manage. Could you be more specific? Maybe open an issue listing points for possible improvement?
2.
by replooda 5mo ago
What are the perceived issues?
3.
by replooda 5mo ago
And homunculi such as Mark Zuckerberg.
4.
by replooda 5mo ago
Time flies! Two years already since that video.[0] Anyway, to answer your question: He's a billionaire. [0] https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=FZeB7SwmkiQ
5.
by replooda 5mo ago
"KeePassXC asks us to be skeptical of them if we are skeptical of LLMs.[0] This is a convincing argument. A password manager doesn't need 300 regular contributors armed with 14 LLMs; it just needs to do its job, be stable, and be
6.
by replooda 5mo ago
He created a throwaway account to ask the question without linking his profile to his identity, slipped and replied with the main account, then ran damage control. I hope he'll take from that he isn't very good at the Jason Bourne
7.
by replooda 5mo ago
I'm sorry, I really do think you should let the police handle the "who was that guy" angle before moving on to the technical one. It would take more than "drove a Mediacom truck, showed an ID and knew my address" be
8.
by replooda 5mo ago
Mark Zuckerberg and such?
9.
by replooda 5mo ago
Posts such as yours — "most jews..." — help push forward the narrative that anyone critical of them is antisemitic.
10.
by replooda 5mo ago
> And the US could easily just keep destroying every asset in Iran Could — and even more so: could easily — in an "if ifs and buts..." sense or materially? Wouldn't they run (weren't they running) out of resources? An
11.
by replooda 5mo ago
In short: Deduplication efforts frustrated by hardlink limits per inode — and a solution compatible with different file systems.
12.
by replooda 5mo ago
Never mind rethinking Copilot entrypoints; are users still forced to have a Microsoft account "for their own safety"? If so, the company isn't making much of an effort to deceive.
13.
by replooda 6mo ago
I'm replying to this using Hacki. Glider has treated me well too. Both are available on F-Droid.
14.
by replooda 6mo ago
I'd go for the discussion on Meeks' post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599305
15.
by replooda 6mo ago
> The community makes the system and decides what’s tolerable. That is to say, the community decides the type of users it expects to serve. Sure, but the community isn't the system; it may inform the direction the system will take,
16.
by replooda 6mo ago
> What do you consider laziness? In this context, what I expanded above as foisting onto others the responsibility for the effort required by what we want to accomplish. > Why do you believe pointing to the manual is newbie friendly?
17.
by replooda 6mo ago
What is? No coddling? Little tolerance toward laziness? Zero toward entitlement? That's closer to the opposite of being patronizing, I would say. They point to documentation in response to the kind of request I've seen closed with
18.
by replooda 6mo ago
I'd count it as one in the general sense I'd count the style(9) manpage as another, not in the specific sense I indicated I was referring to: > ... fine without a code of conduct — in the sense bakugo employed "code of con
19.
by replooda 6mo ago
I find it just the opposite. I can think of few communities nearly as patient or welcoming to anyone who's earnest and willing to put in the work to learn; true, there's no coddling or hand-holding, and, indeed, it tends to be ver
20.
by replooda 6mo ago
Time, I would say. First, there's the sense that the poison will produce its effects, revealing itself in hindsight; of course, we'd rather catch it before it does, but that isn't always possible, and the best we can do is to
21.
by replooda 6mo ago
Thank you for such an inspiring reply.
22.
by replooda 6mo ago
OpenBSD, a rather more complex project, seems to be doing fine without a code of conduct — in the sense bakugo employed "code of conduct," not in the generalized sensed you conflated it with in your non sequitur.
23.
by replooda 6mo ago
> For the same reason the US is not using it. Not quite. To be sure, that's the reason some go the extra mile, make odd sacrifices; but that comes on top of "the special relationship" in the US. It goes beyond [0] the usua
24.
by replooda 6mo ago
> they are a civilised western country, "Civilization" measured by prisoners sodomized with cutting objects or starved to death? And where does "country" give place to illegal occupation? > who does not commit geno
25.
by replooda 6mo ago
Experiment-with-teenager-mental-health Meta used the save-the-kids cry to lobby and push for age verification; however much or whatever they stand to lose due to the expected consequence of their approach, they certainly expect to be more t
26.
by replooda 6mo ago
I apologize for failing to patronize your intelligence so you wouldn't read in my message what I didn't write. A regurgitation of the zeitgeist can be a useful sample of the zeitgeist, leading to insights perhaps completely differ
27.
by replooda 6mo ago
Not about the specific piece, however, which was good enough to sprout accounts to denounce it.
28.
by replooda 6mo ago
Maybe they infiltrate a supply chain to produce explosive pagers, with the hope it will explode on their targets and do so without harming innocents.
29.
by replooda 6mo ago
That's the issue with their transitioning into Microsoft: if they say "the sky is blue," it's received as a random binary stream, meaningless except for it's goal of bypassing privacy protections and selling my data
30.
by replooda 6mo ago
Not that simple a thread, are you now, simplethread, if you need cookies and JS.

More ›