renku

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by renku 8y ago

   I think the main advantage of Markdown is that the source is equally readable without having to run it through a processor. I don't think this really applies to this Mermaid library. For a Markdown-like I would expect more of an ASCII-
2. 2.▲
   by renku 10y ago

   What you mean to say: JavaScript is not class-oriented. Sure, there are features that JavaScript lacks compared to other object-oriented languages, but saying that it's not object-oriented is like saying that it's statically typed
3. 3.▲
   by renku 10y ago

   "robotic" part seems to be pure clickbait. From robotic you would expect something that would act autonomously. This one doesn't even seem to be automatic - requiring one to push a button or use some app to control it at the
4. 4.▲
   by renku 10y ago

   The problems you describe aren't really problems with Code Review per se, rather with the process that's enforcing the reviews. The idea of code reviews is that somebody else reads your code and provides feedback. Whether the revi
5. 5.▲
   by renku 10y ago

   It's hard to decide which are the critical changes. Even a single line change can have major consequences - where do you draw the line... I guess both 100% code review coverage and 100% test coverage are extremes that one shouldn'
6. 6.▲
   by renku 10y ago

   What are these "more direct and optimal measures" that are cheaper than code reviews? In my experience code reviews are much cheaper than other means of raising software quality. For example unit tests only start to add real value