remoquete

7 ms·

1.
by remoquete 1y ago
Agreed. These tests should be performed on local models.
2.
by remoquete 1y ago
Using prompts know to be problematic? Some sort of... Voight-Kampff test for LLMs?
3.
Build your own tech writing tools using LLMs(passo.uno)
2 points by remoquete 1y ago|0 comments
4.
Show HN: A tool that lets tech writers test custom LLM prompts with context
1 points by remoquete 1y ago|0 comments
5.
by remoquete 1y ago
Because you can't. See my previous comment. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43748908
6.
by remoquete 1y ago
Indeed. Augmentation is the way forward.
7.
by remoquete 1y ago
This is nice and fun for getting some fast indications on an unknown codebase, but, as others said here and elsewhere, it doesn't replace human-made documentation. https://passo.uno/whats-wrong-ai-generated-docs/
8.
by remoquete 1y ago
What's the Gemini equivalent of Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex? I've found projects like reugn/gemini-cli, but Gemini Code Assist seems limited to VS Code?
9.
Things I remind myself when working with others(passo.uno)
2 points by remoquete 1y ago|2 comments
10.
by remoquete 1y ago
AI-or-not silliness aside (gets boring real fast): I find Gemini to be faster (it matters), more reliable, with quality of responses being at the same level as Claude's. Better integration with Google apps and devices is a plus.
11.
by remoquete 1y ago
You can. Then again, I'm paying.
12.
by remoquete 1y ago
Could be, if an AI actually wrote it.
13.
by remoquete 1y ago
The improvement in Gemini 2.5 is real, but I wouldn't say it's miles away from Claude 3.7. The fact that web browsing still isn't in Claude in Europe bothered me. It's many little things.
14.
by remoquete 1y ago
Image generation is extremely good in GPT now. Claude's edge is UX. But I doubt Google won't catch up on both fronts. It has the technology and manpower.
15.
by remoquete 1y ago
I was a loyal Claude user until I decided to try Gemini 2.5. "After all", I thought, "I already use a Pixel phone, so it's integrated with Android. And with Google Drive. And I can get it through my Google One subscripti
16.
by remoquete 1y ago
And CDI plans better than those in year MMXXV.
17.
by remoquete 1y ago
I'm wondering how this protectionist trend will impact overseas hires. Will US companies continue to hire talent remotely outside of their borders? Will they be incentivized to only hire in the US?
18.
What's wrong with AI-generated docs(passo.uno)
2 points by remoquete 1y ago|0 comments
19.
by remoquete 1y ago
I'm a tech optimist, but I struggle to see a fast solution to the problems described by this article that doesn't involve ending apps and screens for good.
20.
by remoquete 1y ago
The most interesting content I found through HN had no pictures or illustrations.
21.
Critique of Work(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points by remoquete 1y ago|0 comments
22.
by remoquete 2y ago
I'm seeing more reactions like this. I wonder if it's a consequence of reading AI generated drivel and not being able to tell content apart. Or perhaps people is asking for more action and less reaction. I don't know.
23.
Technical writing has a depth issue(passo.uno)
4 points by remoquete 2y ago|0 comments
24.
by remoquete 2y ago
I don't know. I work for a B-series startup and I'm a docs engineer.
25.
First "Synthetic Biological Intelligence" runs on living human cells(newatlas.com)
4 points by remoquete 2y ago|0 comments
26.
by remoquete 2y ago
> almost nobody has (or puts in) the time to properly edit a twenty+ pages document to make it pleasant to read That's why technical writers and editors exist.
27.
by remoquete 2y ago
More common than you'd think...
28.
by remoquete 2y ago
Some docs are better than none, but writing less is not easy.
29.
Technical English is nobody's mother tongue(passo.uno)
3 points by remoquete 2y ago|0 comments
30.
by remoquete 2y ago
If functional code can be written and deployed by juniors using an LLM, then perhaps the required business logic isn't that complex after all. Ask them to write a device driver or a kernel module, or code a faster algorithm for, say, s

More ›