reliablereason

5 ms·

1.
by reliablereason 6d ago
Biological minds in biological organisms are self referential in the way that you have a neural network that forms a model of the world. That model then "discovers" that it is "it self a part of the world" so it tries to
2.
by reliablereason 20d ago
It's likely/It could be an effect of more reinforcement learning in training compared to earlier. You need loots of RL to learn to code well.
3.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
(1) LLMs collapse and start outputting garbage after a number of tokens if you do not sample and just pick the "best token" each time. This is a consequence of how they are trained.
4.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Presumably it is just that no one has tried to do it all the way yet. But i know there is some experimental work out there. https://x.com/comma_ai/status/1956879764829995394
5.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Interesting topic. That said I don't know how useful this is since LLMs are primarily trained using mode-covering training rather than Mode-seeking(RL) training, which means LLMs can not form (and does not have) the same underlying str
6.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Yes there is. The use of Gödel numbers to represent a system that contain itself is infinite regression.
7.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Gödels incompleteness is just an example of the fact that you cant determine the outcome of infinite regression (in the general case). The same as me asking you to give me the last digit of pi. I am a bit annoyed by pop science always twist
8.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
I would think coaxial designs suffer as the lower rotor works in more turbulent non laminar air.
9.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
That would "using reason in chain of thought".
10.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
That would not be intuition that is just randomness. Intuition is not randomness. A jump in intuition comes from automatic processes reorganising the relational structure of conceptual models. There is no reorganisation of the model durring
11.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Clearly it impossible to observe brain chemistry by looking at a person. Psychedelics does however have longterm behavioural effects that are statistically significant and to some extent observable. Using a definition of brain chemistry tha
12.
by reliablereason 1mo ago
Clearly LLMs cant do leaps of intuition since their "intuition" is locked after training ends. The only way a LLM can come up with new ideas if the "idea" appeared as a generalisation durring training or if it was achiev
13.
by reliablereason 2mo ago
It certainly looks like a Claude design to some extent; not all they way however.
14.
by reliablereason 2mo ago
Nice job, i have also been working on a few JEPA based models during the last few months. Trying to make more efficient LLMs. I feel like you hit the main issues in the use of jepa models (well except collapse but sigREG more or less solves
15.
by reliablereason 3mo ago
Wont this kill the kv cache? Also i am pretty sure neither open ai or anthropic leets you seed the agents own tokens.
16.
by reliablereason 3mo ago
Is the thinking even done in real tokens? I thought it was done using the pure residual stream. That is instead of collapsing the residual stream to a token you treat the final layers output as a vector of size d_model and use that as input
17.
by reliablereason 3mo ago
If you have a number that is 1000^90000000 that number is larger than the number of atoms in the observable universe.
18.
by reliablereason 4mo ago
The issue is apparently this commit (someone did a git bisect): https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/commit/859d44fa4f14207... Which is a fix to the security issue CVE-2026-29518: https://nvd.nist
19.
by reliablereason 4mo ago
"A is not B instead A is blah blah" instead of just saying "A" is a very common pattern have seen in Claude. It is strange to read as the topic A has often not been introduced and introducing it by saying what it is not
20.
by reliablereason 4mo ago
No you could rent virtualised servers way before AWS. AWS simply had good marketing. The virtualised server thing was not a AWS thing, the thing that was were their other services. For example instead of renting a virtual server and install
21.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Pragmatically enterprise tends to mean less refined, designed by committee and expensive. In this case i would guess it is mostly a justification for taking a part of the LLM pie.
22.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Not sure that i understand your position exactly. But consciousness is also "just a story" (a complicated one) that the human body tells the human mind. We cant know from the outside if "the story" inside a LLM is detail
23.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
I was not talking about the actual feeling in the moment. The point is the valence of the thing. Ie fear of a thing is a pointer to that thing having negative valence.
24.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Most chatbots are not trained to have/emulate emotions so pain or fear of death is non existent. Therefore killing them and/or using them as slaves is not a moral issue. Thats how i reason. On another point, LLMs are not conscious
25.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Removes paradoxical stuff like claims that there are bigger and smaller infinities. Paradoxes comes from contradictions, a mathematical system that contains contradictions is a failed mathematical system.
26.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Unlikely. That would be extremely expensive in bandwidth, storage and compute. Deciding to build the product like that would be an engineering decision that i would fire someone for.
27.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
I wonder under what circumstances footage from the glasses are uploaded for classification. Probably this is people asking the glasses something about what they see and the glasses uploading video for classification to generate an answer. P
28.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
Okay. If it made it, it made it. That is true in a deductible way. If p, then p.
29.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
The statistics is generally not. But the data used to learn the statistics may have been under license. Learning from licensed material is generally accepted in humans, you may learn from something and then create something else and the new
30.
by reliablereason 5mo ago
If neither the user or the tool created and is responsible for the text, who is in your mind?

More ›