rejoinder

7 ms·

1.
by rejoinder 13y ago
I find public facing popular G+ accounts suffer much the same, loads of useless comments. 140 comments that you can't be bothered to read. If you do ever read them, you'll notice no one else can be bothered to read so it's
2.
by rejoinder 13y ago
I got freaked out by Facebook because I signed up there using a work email. I think Facebook's recommendation system was using the data from other users' address books. As in I'd get a list of various people that I'd do
3.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Actually I sympathise with the poster here. I just tried to get back to the personalised vanity chooser thing in G+, and ended up clicking on Settings then to Account, which got me to a google account page. On the right handside there is
4.
by rejoinder 13y ago
I agree with most of your moans here, apart from your first. I haven't any issue with the random (probably uuids) strings and url length. I do find G+ difficult to scan though. To the point that it's pointless for me to even bot
5.
by rejoinder 13y ago
My only concern would be the link rot that might occur if your urls are later rewritten to the new username. Which makes a mockery of having the vanity urls in the first place. Having said that I can't even work out if a single Googl
6.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Perhaps that's a new requirement. Some of us don't bother with mobile phones. I signed up for an account, at one time it asked, another it didn't. Try and empty your browser cache and try again.
7.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Yeah, it's inevitable that the Jennifer Smiths are going to get miffed. I preferred the Facebook era without vanity URLs. It seemed sensible. You could for a time (not sure if it still works) email users on facebook by using vanity_h
8.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Weird, others here report that it played fine. Both Chrome and Nightly failed to play it for me. Perhaps a bandwidth issue for me.
9.
by rejoinder 13y ago
yes, hard font to read, looks like impact. And it's too small. When the letters scatter - the radial bursts - never sure if it's an l an i or a j?
10.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Nice hidden feature! Cheers.
11.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Can someone explain the following page please? (As in what's being demonstrated here.) https://yoast.com/research/autocompletetype.php
12.
by rejoinder 13y ago
I guess that's for signed in users?
13.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Only the first video played for me on Linux/Firefox nightly, and Readability choked on it.
14.
by rejoinder 13y ago
The vanity urls really annoy me too. They just don't feel appropriate for these large social networks. I prefered the unique-ids. Which url does John Smith get? Does he get +JohnSmith, and what about the other JohnSmiths? Will they
15.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Hoskins must have some plumbing fetish.
16.
by rejoinder 13y ago
I just read this: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/if-vlc-can-ship-a-free-dvd-pl... What's the deal with VLC and H.264? Is it along the same lines? Also I don't really get why you'd stick with the no
17.
by rejoinder 13y ago
Can you really trademark a name such as Mario?
18.
by rejoinder 13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_Foundation_Burn_a_Million_Qui... Extract: Initially The KLF's earnings were to be distributed by way of a fund for struggling artists managed by the K Foundation, Drummond and Cauty&
19.
by rejoinder 13y ago
One hopes you'll use the bit bucket.