reitzensteinm

8 ms·

1.
by reitzensteinm 7d ago
Yes
2.
by reitzensteinm 16d ago
https://www.ghacks.net/2012/02/26/avast-7-will-install-googl... https://searchengineland.com/google-chrome-page-will-have-pa... https://community.adobe.com/questions-638/
3.
by reitzensteinm 17d ago
Paying a second of CPU time is an inconvenience to a user but trivial for LLM scraping. The GPU cost to pretrain on that page once will dwarf by 2-3 OOMs the CPU cost to compute Anubis, scrape and post process it. And you’re not going to ju
4.
by reitzensteinm 24d ago
You're right, I was talking past you. I have an implicit belief that SQL isn't the most effective low level language we could have and LLMs will free us up to explore that space, similar to asm.js -> WASM. But I'm open to
5.
by reitzensteinm 24d ago
LLMs are also very good at writing code for newly invented languages, especially if they can execute it and iterate. I strongly believe the barrier to switch languages is lowered in a post LLM world. Ten years ago I was at a startup where w
6.
by reitzensteinm 1mo ago
What about cases where e.g. there's an earthquake with thousands of incidents and you need to triage help to the worst? It's not common, but there are absolutely cases where small amounts of intelligence applied in parallel is a g
7.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
M:N distribution itself has been massively devalued in Space Age - it’s so cheap and easy to build everything from scratch in situ with the new production buildings. Eg you don’t need city blocks making circuits, just pipe in molten metal a
8.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
Washing ore is probably the easiest solution - research high levels of mining productivity, put quality modules in drills, filter off uncommon+, and loop them through recyclers until they are at the desired quality level. It’s inefficient b
9.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
I agree they’ll be viable. They’re much harder to use but roughly equally good. Also my late game experience is probably not representative of the phase just after victory where trains may have a slight edge - there could be a sweet spot th
10.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
Yes. Quality boosts storage for wagons and speed for trains. Also unloading is more compact due to inserter belt side selection. I did a 1m eSPM base though, and I don’t think the totality of all of that would bring me back to trains. Belts
11.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
If anything, in immature engineering organizations, preserving netcode invariants to successfully deliver a multiplayer project might benefit from a little of that disposition.
12.
by reitzensteinm 3mo ago
My belated apologies for the misunderstanding. The irony of me coming here and throwing shade on your work as a result is not lost on me.
13.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
I never doubted that . It’s clear the author knows their shit.
14.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
“Functions use dynamic scoping. This is categorically a mistake, and one which ironically has been suggested to seriously mess up fexprs.” (links to Kernel) It’s possible my interpretation wasn’t correct and the author was citing Kernel’s a
15.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
The dig at Kernel is kind of depressing. It's probably an evolutionary dead end, but god damn it, the world is better when people try things. Dismissing them doesn't make you cool.
16.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
I had Windows and Mac laptops back then, and the HN snobbishness around the superiority of the Mac was genuinely baffling. My i9 2019 MBP with discrete graphics was probably the worst laptop purchase I ever made. Docking it to an external m
17.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
Are we reading the same post? They literally point to bugs X and Y. I don't see politics, I see frustrated maintainers of a hobby project that aren't particularly professional.
18.
by reitzensteinm 4mo ago
Bun in its current state absolutely has issues like segfaults. As nice as it is, I moved off of it back to node for production. Folks generally tolerate issues if they believe they’ll get better with time. I know I did for a while. If that
19.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
Well, I found the proposal clear and your response confusing. There are reasons it might not work, not least of all political. But a link to a paper picking a bone with LCoE is talking past GP.
20.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
No Code, surely?
21.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
From my experience, a tiny alarm sounds, a voice says cyclist approaching and the door clicks to locked. At least I believe it did, I heard a sound. I didn't check the handle. I don't believe the car was specifically in a bike lan
22.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
Elektrek went from insufferably pro Tesla to insufferably anti Tesla. If you liked it before and not now, your quarrel is with the direction of the propaganda.
23.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
I wrote a library called Temper, which simulates the Rust/C++ memory model with atomics in a similar way to Loom. But it goes much deeper on that narrow domain, and to my knowledge it's the most accurate library of its kind with t
24.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
At the intersection of these two topics, does Antithesis have any capabilities around simulating memory ordering to validate lock free algorithms?
25.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
You can still rewind by storing checkpoints, resuming at the most recent before the seek time and fast forwarding from there. The updates thing is a shame. You can store multiple configuration files for balance patches, but executable code
26.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
There's not a lot of churn in Unity, but that's more because they mostly fail to ship anything of significance than due to excellence in backwards compatibility. I was in the audience when DOTS was announced, and a decade later Ci
27.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
Yes, absolutely. I did that before vibecoding too, as rapidly editing and testing is so crucial. The way Bevy's internal state is so easily saved and loaded is convenient for this.
28.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
Compile times are my biggest struggle, too. I'm vibecoding Bevy with parallel agents, and the bottleneck is often compiling the changes on my 7950X, not getting Codex to write them. As far as file sizes go, I'd be really intereste
29.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
This site is excellent. I emailed the author to thank them after reading it cover to cover, and they replied and asked if anything was unclear or if there was anything I wanted to see explored more. Quite the dedication to a free resource!
30.
by reitzensteinm 5mo ago
But this document does not. Note it says 12.5%, not 12,5%. 1 TWh on the scale of a country is very little - a 1 GW nuclear plant operating continuously would generate over 8 TWh a year. Nevertheless the back of the napkin math of land requi

More ›