redlohr

7 ms·

1.
by redlohr 1y ago
On first read, I was prone to agree with the author -- why put down someone seeking your input? Then I read your comment and went through it again. After a re-read I think you have it right. The response was direct, and perhaps quite cuttin
2.
by redlohr 3y ago
To me the image in question is unbelievable because there is no place to work -- no paths to walk. Even in the most cluttered offices a narrow corridor to the abused but available chair is sacrosanct, in my experience at least.
3.
by redlohr 3y ago
Being aware of this bias is important -- in the same way that being aware of bias in all media is important. I don't think that there's all that much blame to be assigned. If anything, it's an interesting lens into the biases
4.
by redlohr 3y ago
Oh, that's a great idea. I have a doc that I maintain by hand, either via ">>" or editing directly. Time to go and make a shortcut. Do you do any annotation to help with the search?
5.
by redlohr 3y ago
I've taken to using both vim and nvim, with nvim having copilot. There are times when I'm going in, knowing that I'm re-inventing the wheel, or that I'm refactoring. For those times when I feel like copilot would just ge
6.
by redlohr 3y ago
Regardless of the accuracy of the origin story, Confabulation Theory[0] is the first place that I can recall this sort of explanation that combines knowledge with "honest lies". I don't know how accepted his definition of the
7.
by redlohr 5y ago
Any of the eight tuples should probably not be in order ( or just let one of them through ). An easier method might be to limit shuffling to once every minute. Neat concept! edit: burningfrog's suggestion is an alternative to shuffle t