redeye100

6 ms·

1.
by redeye100 2mo ago
Decorrolated, not unrelated. It can provide value for some things, but not for others
2.
by redeye100 4mo ago
> represented in the training data This isn’t a binary is/isn’t thing though. What if only 80% of my task is, how would I know that the other part isn’t, if I haven’t worked it through fully What if my task is generally represented,
3.
by redeye100 4mo ago
This sounds like a subjective assessment. I counter with the opinion that most LLMs write technically correct, but bad code. When I read it, it makes me want to gag or poke my eyes out. I spend a lot of time wondering about what kind of per
4.
by redeye100 4mo ago
It’s like a modern gun (or nuclear bomb). They’re really only necessary because other people also have guns. We could have all the same effects with swords and bows and arrows. This just 10x’s the effect of deciding to use the thing. So now
5.
by redeye100 4mo ago
Of course he's not writing a legal contract, but to go from saying: > This whole thread is an overreaction. 302 comments about code that does not work. We haven’t committed to rewriting. There’s a very high chance all this code gets
6.
by redeye100 4mo ago
Here is him saying that in words that could be interpreted as ‘this is just an experiment’: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019226
7.
by redeye100 5mo ago
The logic is so fractured and inconsistent, almost incoherent. Almost as if an LLM made it up
8.
by redeye100 1y ago
This is just bad design. Or a faulty tool. Why should the job market shift to accommodate this gap in the functioning of LLMs? This is a bug that needs to be fixed. I have a personal gripe about this bringing an unfinished tool to market an
9.
by redeye100 3y ago
I've seen a lot of people producing content for TikTok. Both low-effort (just having fun) and high-effort
10.
by redeye100 3y ago
Yep this is exactly why