red75prime

7 ms·

1.
by red75prime 4d ago
> remember to kill all pedophile murderers like... What's this bullshit?
2.
by red75prime 4d ago
Oh! A testable prediction. Here's mine: there will surely be a lot of politicking around who qualifies to be the independent evaluator, but they'll agree on something because they are really scared.
3.
by red75prime 5d ago
BTW, LCOE isn't that good estimate. It doesn't account for the system costs. LFSCOE (Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity) does better in estimating the amount of money you actually need to spend.
4.
by red75prime 6d ago
> When working on something from scratch, the best an agent can do is the average of whatever is in its training set and the clarity of the text prompts. Nah. The best it can do is to use the best writing style a model learned. Post-trai
5.
by red75prime 6d ago
1 tonne of steel requires around 5MWh of energy at 50,000 tonnes per day it's around 250GWh of batteries at 50% usage. The largest planned BESS is 19GWh. As I said solar+BESS is impractical. Wind is more expensive. Onshore wind turbine
6.
by red75prime 6d ago
> You install 12 hours worth of batteries at the factory I literally laughed out loud, sorry. Providing baseload with BESS alone? That's rich. Literally. Extremely expensive. In addition to impractical amount of batteries it require
7.
by red75prime 6d ago
Predictability will not get a plant through the night by itself. BTW, it's about 7 units of wind energy to 1 unit of solar energy plus significant overcapacity plus increase of the grid transmission capacity plus additional measures fo
8.
by red75prime 7d ago
Do you know how South Australia solved a problem of the Whyalla Steelworks when transitioning to 100% renewable electricity? They excluded on-site generation of the plant from the statistics. "Solarization" of the plant hadn'
9.
by red75prime 7d ago
...including rewrites into another language
10.
by red75prime 7d ago
Fred Lambert is very biased against Tesla to the point of forsaking journalistic integrity. I fact checked a few of his articles and found a number of omissions that benefit his narrative.
11.
by red75prime 7d ago
I guess it's a fraction of problems on which a model produces a LEAN proof or a counterexample.
12.
by red75prime 7d ago
Is it that complex? Whatever you feel stays inside you. From the outside you make noises, gestures, facial expressions. We can obtain fMRI data an so on. Operationalization is how to connect observables with the presence of soul in a subjec
13.
by red75prime 7d ago
Or under strict privacy measures, maybe? When you are forbidden to connect a user and the user's data.
14.
by red75prime 9d ago
At least, to discuss it, rather than having other people wisely nodding along: "I feel that too."
15.
by red75prime 9d ago
Establishing plagiarism requires sufficient similarity between works. Training data changing a model’s weights in some direction, and the model then producing a different solution, hardly qualifies. But, yeah, priority is much more finicky.
16.
by red75prime 9d ago
"Our work is so much harder than their work that AI now does" is a refrain of the AI story. In technical terms you concern can be stated as "AI needs to be much more sample-efficient to not be bottlenecked by the speed of doi
17.
by red75prime 10d ago
Investing in training a person gets you one trained person. Investing in training an ML system gets you a cloneable ML system that can be scaled on demand much faster. ROI might change quickly.
18.
by red75prime 10d ago
Ah, sorry, it's ASML expertise that needs to be cloned and scaled up. I don't see how it changes things, though. Robots don't need that much intelligence. High-speed joint control, "hand-eye coordination", the highe
19.
by red75prime 10d ago
You've missed a part where it's TSMC that does behavioral cloning (to build more EUV machines). The full vertical integration is a bit farther down the line. Etching a model's weights on silicon is another way to utilize non-
20.
by red75prime 10d ago
You need to operationalize it to decide whether non-human systems can have it.
21.
by red75prime 10d ago
Is it this fuzzy blob of ineffable experiences, aesthetics, qualia, self-reference, dualism, spirituality and other things? I don't need to reject all this to notice that its fuzziness makes it impossible to operationalize.
22.
by red75prime 10d ago
For example, TSMC uses behavioral cloning to scale up human-bottlenecked parts of the manufacturing process to meet the growing demand, while automated research laboratories do thousands experiments in parallel to find better manufacturing
23.
by red75prime 11d ago
Who's saying that compute will become infinitely abundant? "Singularity" is just a way of saying that known models begin to give absurd predictions. Anyway, intelligence is a way of overcoming obstacles. 10 million tonnes of
24.
by red75prime 11d ago
What will prevent LLMs from designing robot control circuitry and participating in increase of chip production/design and physical experimentation? How do you think why there's this fad of producing general purpose humanoid robots
25.
by red75prime 12d ago
A VLM (a vision-language model) is already being used by Waymo[1]. It's useful for scenarios that require reasoning and general knowledge. [1] https://waymo.com/blog/2025/12/demonstrably-safe-ai-for-auto.
26.
by red75prime 13d ago
OK. Demonstrate it. BTW, you can easily read critiques of "The mismeasure of Man" if you want to.
27.
by red75prime 14d ago
I mean that it's hard to determine retroactively how much time it would have taken humanity to solve an open problem that was solved by AI. This is a measure that can make ASI look mundane because we don't know how long it would h
28.
by red75prime 14d ago
A very long tail of problems that weren't solved by humans? Sure. It's a sarcastic take and I understand that you are probably talking about "spiky intelligence", but you've chosen unsolved problems as a measure of
29.
by red75prime 14d ago
Is it a serious question? IQ tries to quantify the positive correlation between the results of all intellectual tasks a person takes (AKA positive manifold).
30.
by red75prime 16d ago
> They clear their mind and let the solution come. They work on a problem until their brain is full of problem-related concepts. Then something comes. After validation it might be a solution.

More ›