rebane2001

6 ms·

1.
by rebane2001 2mo ago
this reads like slop
2.
by rebane2001 3mo ago
No, the API will not return the admin-only removal reason. The code path that causes this is in the post.
3.
by rebane2001 3mo ago
wait what the heck yeah, this is the same post as from a few days ago, i guess the comment and post timestamps got glitched??
4.
by rebane2001 3mo ago
(author of x86css) Not possible, but it would be possible to reimplement Quake's logic and controls in CSS to have it run without JS. I was considering doing that for my next CSS crime project, though now that CSSQuake has hit the hn f
5.
Show HN: JavaScript Crossword – a crossword where the clue = eval(answer)(lyra.horse)
7 points by rebane2001 4mo ago|0 comments
6.
by rebane2001 4mo ago
You cannot close HTML tags that way anyways, <br> and <br/> are the same, as are <div> and <div/>. The spec defines whether an element self-closes, the slash is just ignored.
7.
by rebane2001 6mo ago
(author of x86css) not only do i think doom in css is possible, but both me and another css person were also planning on actually making it into reality but it sort of feels demotivating to see js-powered css projects like this hit the fron
8.
by rebane2001 6mo ago
the difference is that knowing 2^8 is generally not useful to people who don't know it this here is something that's pretty useful to most ssh users, yet seldom spoken of a better analogy would be comparing it to calling a very go
9.
by rebane2001 6mo ago
tldr is so good, i wish it was a part of the os the same way manpages are just to help out newcomers
10.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
it's a placeholder that gets replaces by the python script on build
11.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
Yes, CSS binary data transfer is possible in bith directions.
12.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
clock != looping, those examples already loop (dont need a line per iteration), but just dont have a built-in clock and requiring a clock is imo dismissable, because pretty much all modern technology needs a clock too (either from the power
13.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
I think x86 is still good because it's easily understandable. If I say it's an 8086 emulator, people who aren't familiar with the 8086 aren't gonna go "oh so like an older version of the same x86 on my computer&quot
14.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
It's really easy, I was considering adding it. The easiest way is to make an @property that's animated at ridiculous speeds that can be sampled to get (sort of) random bits.
15.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
I did not use any AI
16.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
When you download an x86 program you're making a lot of other assumptions too, such as what the target operating system and hardware are. Even 8086 MSDOS software won't directly work in this emulator because it's not emulatin
17.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
That wikipedia article lists the 8086 in its "Chronology of x86 processors" section as an x86-16 CPU.
18.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
Why is the 8086 not equivalent to x86? PCLMULHQHQDQ is from the CLMUL extension, which only began appearing in CPUs in the early 2010s - are CPUs from before then not x86?
19.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
I wasn't sure whether to address the disconnect in the FAQ - I wanted it to be short and readable. The idea is that, since a long time ago, there has always been demos that prove turing completeness and other programmy qualities in C
20.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
8086 is x86 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86
21.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
i'm glad llms won't be coming after my niche anytime soon
22.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
I do actually have a CSS CVE[0] in Chrome, but it was in the changelog as "in Animation" instead of "in CSS", so no fun stories/headlines for me :c [0] https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2025&#x2F
23.
by rebane2001 7mo ago
It relies on a few things, but @functions, if() statements, and container style queries are the main ones.
24.
Show HN: X86CSS – An x86 CPU emulator written in CSS(lyra.horse)
275 points by rebane2001 7mo ago|93 comments
25.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
I've now added the algorithm explanation to the GitHub README.
26.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
Added now!
27.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
Yeah, that was the intention.
28.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
I'd need to implement a js brotli decompressor, or make you download a file that's 5x bigger, to use that.
29.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
Yeah I plan on putting the code for that on GitHub soon too.
30.
by rebane2001 8mo ago
I made this project from start to finish in less than a day, and I feel it was well worth my time and effort.

More ›