realusername

5 ms·

1.
by realusername 6d ago
Same, I don't even see how that would work since you see the full thinking traces in Kimi but are hidden with Claude. And the Deepseek one sounds even more dubious as Deepseek is one of the cheapest model around, why relay anything to
2.
by realusername 9d ago
Agree to disagree then, AOSP apps feel abandonned since roughly Android 11 and I don't think they are fit for modern use anymore
3.
by realusername 9d ago
> Or would you say that the Play Services bring the security model to Google-certified Android, GrapheneOS implements its own security model from scratch, and LineageOS as well? Yes I would say that most of the security decisions are no
4.
by realusername 9d ago
That's true, however, if you are too far from the top models, you still are in danger of not being in the race anymore. And with half the score of the top models, that's where Mistral is at. As it is now, no tech company in the EU
5.
by realusername 9d ago
I don't have a final opinion on the subject, it's just the results I witnessed after a long time in the industry. The ones I've seen with Angular suffered from the same issues. I'm sure counter examples of well managed S
6.
by realusername 9d ago
The stack is Rails / React SPA for the frontend. > Is it being used even sort-of in the right place / way? It's a SaaS where users are mostly always logged-in, kind of an app so you would think it should work from the outs
7.
by realusername 10d ago
I'm currently working on a SaaS at my company and we have a lot of issues because of the SPA, I estimate we spend around 5% at least, maybe 10% of the workforce just on SPA complexity. It can work for some SaaS but if you stay low empl
8.
by realusername 10d ago
It doesn't because AOSP itself is unusable on a modern phone. It's just a low level technical building block nowadays and everybody is chosing the parts they want. Comparing your OS to AOSP itself made sense in 2016, it doesn&#x27
9.
by realusername 11d ago
You are just reinventing LineageOS here basically, patching the defects of AOSP to make it work on real phones
10.
by realusername 11d ago
I don't only mean "scale" in terms of users but also scale in terms of features. So you have to guarantee that your product will stay low users and low features forever or spend a very high effort to try to partially overcome
11.
by realusername 11d ago
That's a good point but you never know that from the start, "this app won't scale well" is a hard sell for a new project in my opinion
12.
by realusername 12d ago
I've never seen an SPA which scales properly and doesn't become a bloated mess, maybe that's possible but it's definitely harder to make it work than using traditional server side template rendering
13.
by realusername 12d ago
In theory you can try to do that with Treble but in practice the experience will be horrible, there's not even a functional keyboard nor a functional call manager in there. And yes all the Linux side of things is still missing.
14.
by realusername 12d ago
No you can't, AOSP doesn't even include a functional keyboard not a functional call manager nowadays. And I'm not even talking about the firmware side of things Sure that might be enough for very basic hardware like your dron
15.
by realusername 14d ago
Yes that's also one of the historical struggles of Google Translate, the pronouns are context based and so are the words, you need experience to know when they start and end. It's a miserable experience for translation software.
16.
by realusername 14d ago
> Some of the tools and dictionaries used for Viet-English are wonky There's basically no real complete English/Viet dictionary anyways, the best ones are 90% there. LLMs here are the best experience
17.
by realusername 14d ago
It's going to be the same as PRISM, people will be outraged and business will go back as usual. (And they totally won't do it again they swear, the contract says so)
18.
by realusername 15d ago
I'm talking about it as an app distribution method from the perspective of a developer and an app distribution method you can only ask a few people on Github to perform definitely isn't a valid one to me.
19.
by realusername 15d ago
> "Block[ing] every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with Google, signed their contract, paid up, and handed over government ID. Every app and every device, worldwide, with no opt-out" Personally for me, a fak
20.
by realusername 15d ago
What would be "really bad" for you? Non-google Android is dead outside of China and you can't realistically distribute software either without a Google stamp. I don't see much difference between Android and iOS in terms
21.
by realusername 15d ago
Things are really bad already on Android. Most bootloaders are locked, Google prevents you to use the very few unlocked ones through the (legally questionable) Play Integrity. AOSP is basically dead (it doesn't even include a functiona
22.
by realusername 16d ago
I do prefer Firefox devtools to Chrome, that's one of the reasons I use it at work. I think both are kind of equivalent nowadays but I find that the Firefox one has a better design and looks more polished
23.
by realusername 17d ago
Will you upstream it?
24.
by realusername 17d ago
For bots, usually a monopoly just paints a bigger target on your back than custom low scale prevention methods. And Cloudflare is no exception, the "hello world" of bots is Cloudflare bypass.
25.
by realusername 17d ago
They aren't, most emission statistics are counting imported emissions. China's figure aren't that great on their own, with exportation deducted.
26.
by realusername 17d ago
Those are already included in most statistics
27.
by realusername 20d ago
If you can't prove it, you can't prove it both ways. Either everybody gets to use it or nobody does. Especially that the code getting trained on is for the vast majority copyrighted open source software so if anybody has something
28.
by realusername 20d ago
That's not going to save them, the model could leak GPL licensed code on output as well, and it's an order of magnitude more likely than leaking internal documents. These large tech companies can't have their cake and eat it
29.
by realusername 21d ago
That's nonsense, then it would also be somewhat illegal to use it inside Apple, being trained on GPL licensed code (and it's not even a possibility here but a known fact)
30.
by realusername 21d ago
They all do that, some are just more honest to tell you upfront than others.

More ›