reallyseriously

6 ms·

1.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Informal at the places I've worked meant wearing silly shirts on Friday and harsh language was used if you screwed up. If a woman quit does that mean it was a sexist workplace? If a guy quit after being berated is that different? I don
2.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
If we're talking about for example, a woman being the first one on the team everyone expects will take notes, I identify with someone that feels it is the symptom of a larger problem very easily. Same with things like, "C'mon
3.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Well thanks a lot, now I feel like a jerk for being so uppity. jk. I'd never heard the term brogrammer anywhere but HN and just reading it, no less typing it makes me cringe a little. Take care.
4.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Is this the part where I should say something about how they need to "toughen up" and they must be "too sensitive"? jk. That's actually a real shame. I'm not going to venture a guess at the % of threads that an
5.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"You genuinely think that 'software tool with female name' is as 'bad' as 'software tool with male name?" No, I said that a software tool with a male or female name would not be sexist by definition and I
6.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Good point, contexts were definitely conflated, sloppy reasoning. A better example would have been a programming language or software tool with a female name or slang. Of course, that wouldn't be sexist by definition and I wouldn'
7.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
If I may cut in, he's saying "bro" is poking fun at other men so it has nothing to do with making a joke at the expense of women. At the same time, all people, both men and women can take aka understand "the joke" s
8.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"How very odd that despite all of our behaviour being so non-offensive and non-exclusionary, we don't seem to have any women who want to hang around this forum with us..." Correlation -> Causation? Is that seriously why yo
9.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Is the word "bro" sexist? If a woman says, "Hey guurl" is that sexist? They're both exclusionary, right? But aren't they just friendly greetings and anything more you put into it is your own personal baggage? L
10.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
If you're going to police people on their specific word choice over their intent and actual meaning, are you concerned about hurting "innocent" people? Not everyone loads the same baggage onto the word "bro" that yo
11.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
One of the top headlining comedians in the US talks about this. Some people will be having a great time at his show and laughing at everything. But, then when it comes around to something about them, all of the sudden it's not so funny
12.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
You've nailed it here. Sexism and racism, etc. are serious issues but some people, for whatever reason, have lost all sense of perspective.
13.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Intent doesn't matter? I hope you don't mean that. If someone truly does not mean to be offensive and uses a term either out of ignorance or because they don't associate the word with the same things you do, they are not a &q
14.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Agree, whether it's startups or politics, those born into a lower social class don't really have advocates (obviously politicians pay lip service to the poor). That said, if a group of upper-class women want to have a founder conf
15.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"It seems you need a bit more than dclowd9901" How arrogant and condescending.
16.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Agree, at least in this case it's become clearer that you don't need to be employed by a group of specific companies to get the protections of a journalist. What an absurd idea.
17.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Is it possible for someone to disagree with you without you calling them a liar and belittling them?
18.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Clearly Paul Graham must take steps to change this. I'm not saying he is to blame, but if he does not act he is obviously sexist and a part of the problem.
19.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
The risk is less than you'd think. Things can be contained quite nicely with just some reinforced steel and a bit of water. Accidents should be quite rare too with these self-driving Google cars. Now, I'm not a nuclear engineer, b
20.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"there has not been one important decision we've made that I have not been a part of." Careful, you're not fitting the narrative these people want believe. But seriously, disappointed pg even wrote this. Just engaging wi
21.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Glad PG wrote this and equally glad this is the top comment so far. It appears PG hasn't yet learned that it will never be enough for some people. In anything he writes on this topic he'll leave out some group or state a point in
22.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"and they've made an effort to change" This is weird. What should YC change? Tech Stars doesn't do blind apps or publish all the stats you request so that's not it. "I didn't really want to deal with kegge
23.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Agree w/ the first part but it's not sexist at all for him to note the demographics of the pool of talent he's choosing from.
24.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
Most of the anti-Snowden stuff seems to get a fair amount of push-back. Agree with what others have said though, in choosing him as Tech Person of the Year isn't a high enough "honor".
25.
by reallyseriously 13y ago
"@ericabiz is very open, transparent and direct about what she has seen and heard." Really? Sounds like she just sat around with some friends who all agreed with each other without any knowledge of anything. Erica: "I've