realgeniushere

5 ms·

1.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
This is a funny cope. > Believe it or not, full screen apps are a Windows thing. Nope. It’s just that maximizing—single action to expand a window the whole screen minus the OS docks/taskbars—is present in every widely used OS exce
2.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Makes me think less of antirez that he doesn’t acknowledge that this is the same design as Microsoft’s BSTRs, which predate sds by many many years.
3.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Maybe this is more productive: What point were you trying to make with your spam comment? And how isn’t it addressed by twitter abiding by viewpoint neutrality but not content neutrality?
4.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Uh, if the class action damages cap is 500k then it’s only worth 500k to Google…
5.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
What a low effort and low thought reply. No one said it is. I’m saying there’s a principled way to have free speech and still take down spam.
6.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
In the government context, this problem is very aptly dealt with by distinguishing “content neutrality” from “viewpoint neutrality”. That’s why the government can punish spam emailers without violating the first amendment.
7.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
This is a false sense of understanding that many Linux users develop. You basically built a puzzle by putting together the pieces that fit together. And you have the illusion that you learned something about the picture drawn on the pieces
8.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
If you put your hand in the fire, no one has punished you with a burn.
9.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
And considering PPP, the US still smokes all the major European powers. What is your point?
10.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That is how many people see the world. Mankind is collectively some kind of God that is responsible for your individual plight.
11.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
You could have bothered to read the article before posting the most obvious, dismissive thing.
12.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
So I agree it has to do with bad governance. But you deflect all blame away from the people in those poorly governed country, instead blaming wealthy people in other countries. I’ll say though, the worst thing the West has done to the third
13.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
What are you talking about? Everyone is eating bigger pieces of pie these days. A lot of the things we take for granted weren’t even available to wealthy people one or two hundred years ago. Electricity, running water, sewage, pharmaceutica
14.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That has to do with questions of what exactly the law prohibits. A lot of white collar law deals with the very murky line between sharp, but legal, business practices and prohibited conduct. Those kinds of issues don’t usually rear their he
15.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That’s only because of political entrenchment. If Europe loosened their labor laws and made other reforms to bring them in line with American business law, they would probably catch up to American GDP per capita pretty quickly. As it stands
16.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That’s a deceptive analysis because catch-up growth is easier. That’s why the Asian Tigers could grow at breakneck speeds, right until they caught up to Western development levels and stagnated just like everyone else.
17.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Go do your own research if you don’t believe me. I’m not your research assistant.
18.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Do you think conservative judges aren’t receptive to fraud cases? Republican appointees regularly give the longest sentences to white collar criminals. Your comment is clearly written about someone who actually knows nothing about law excep
19.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
What? Everyone who could investigate and prosecute SBF right now and for the last two years is a Democrat.
20.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
You know until 2016/2017 we let people post just about anything they wanted on all of the major platforms. Maybe not racial slurs and direct threats, but everything else was good. It was like that for a very long time and mostly everyo
21.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Let them wear coats, said the out of touch queen of the freezing peasants.
22.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
My whole point is that this requirement could suffocate innovation on ports by turning it into a mother-may-I regime in perpetuity. You said, but we had the regime before with micro usb yet still innovated to usb-c. My response was that the
23.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Slow is good for deciding to prohibit . Slow is bad for deciding to allow .
24.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
By eventually doing what the EU is doing when there’s a clear hold out. But instead of carving it in stone, letting it expire in 5 to 10 years. i.e. exactly what my original comment said.
25.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
You’re so close to openly admitting it. Just say it. The ultimate goal is to make it so only the rich can afford comfortable home heating, privacy, transportation, and travel, while the lower and middle classes pay the price for this climat
26.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That’s not how any of this works. 1) Weird to check the inflation charts when you can just check the price of oil and natural gas. They have moved considerably due to the war. 2) Natural gas is not a perfect long term market. It’s a consuma
27.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Execution would be an appropriate punishment for sociopathic lying at this scale. Beyond defrauding investors of millions, she gave patients and doctors fake test results that she knew were fake. She knew that could have led to people dying
28.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
That’s not how sentencing works in this country. The specific crime you were convicted of determines the possible range of sentences. Then judge considers a multitude of factors to determine exact sentence. This includes prior offenses and
29.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
If only a previous president had said so and banned it. Oh, that did happen. And then Biden unbanned it because a bunch of liberal journalists told him to.
30.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
Okay but that doesn’t address my point or defend yours.

More ›