rdiddly

7 ms·

1.
by rdiddly 3d ago
Who the fuck is talking about guns?
2.
by rdiddly 4d ago
I wish I gave a shit about producing value for a company.
3.
by rdiddly 11d ago
This reader revolted after the second unnecessary (and exclaimed!) parenthetical. You can't please some people.
4.
by rdiddly 18d ago
I'm not sure why we're talking about cynicism all of a sudden. I hope it's not because we're framing this blogger's recognition of existing cynicism, as constituting cynicism in and of itself. Because if so, I would
5.
by rdiddly 21d ago
Perhaps they've learned from seeing what happened when we in the États-unis did that.
6.
by rdiddly 22d ago
I agree with that, but I often wonder whether maintaining a separation for longer periods just leads to a bigger backlog of these topics building up and making it worse when it does happen.
7.
by rdiddly 22d ago
Thanks to these assholes destroying entire fisheries, I might not have to wait long.
8.
by rdiddly 23d ago
A crime not having been committed, one of the chief ways you would find out that something is "evidence" is by someone charging you with a crime, as I said, and notice that I do not claim that's the ONLY way to find out. But
9.
by rdiddly 24d ago
The so-called goalposts haven't moved. If anything I keep leading you to a place where you can score, only to have you keep kicking it into the corner for some reason. The goal is not over there, never was. And I don't think it&#x
10.
by rdiddly 24d ago
I'd rather have you answer it, so thanks. My point is that if intent or knowledge is required, that means you must be aware of a crime by you or someone else. Assuming your property has remained under your control, and that you have co
11.
by rdiddly 24d ago
I'm not getting that from it. Although I bet I would, if I started out presuming it's AI and let confirmation bias do the rest.
12.
by rdiddly 25d ago
Okay, and how are you supposed to know when your own property is evidence and when it's not, when you've committed no crime? That reasoning doesn't "work," so in fact that's not how it "works," it&#x2
13.
by rdiddly 25d ago
Evidence of what? Had a crime been charged when the search was undertaken? You can't just declare things evidence in order to get unfettered access to them.
14.
by rdiddly 27d ago
I love it because it put something into words that I was thinking about the last season of the show Succession. All I could say before being armed with this, was something along the lines of it feeling like it was suddenly "all over th
15.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
Yes and with an avian messenger
16.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
I'm repurposing a meme where someone asks something like "Why didn't you ___? Are you stupid?" Basically I'm wondering about the answer to the first question, but the utter absence of any explanation of it makes me
17.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
Useful on its own merits. Everybody who's distracted by the name and can't get past it, there's a thread developing here somewhere, where they're comparing it to Bloomberg.
18.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
Good thing they're not asking $31,980 per year for it then?
19.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
How did you find all these cameras? Am I stupid?
20.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
Jeeeeezus. It's lies all the way down. Did we ever arrive at a true statement from them or is that where they left it? The irony is how unnecessary it was. They could've just said, yeah you're right, we used AI. This is a lev
21.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
You might be surprised at how many famous professional musicians don't read music notation. Outside of the classical world, session work, and jazz fake-books, it's far from de rigueur .
22.
by rdiddly 1mo ago
Welp, the market didn't like that. GOOG dropped about 5% on that news.
23.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
I feel like this overstates the point a bit. The video store was always just a means to an end for me, the clerks always sullen, the process of agreeing on a movie always long & difficult. Maybe I missed out on the phenomenon he's
24.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
Interesting topic, but (to immediately veer off of it) I really wish he would find another word and stop misusing "conspiracy." The word has already been through hell.
25.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
I suspect I'm similar to many users, in that I came to Stack Overflow near the peak, and used it as basically a specialized search engine, without ever asking or answering a question. (I assume this is possible only if you use a widesp
26.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
Yes it's possible, and yes it's time-consuming.
27.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
I talk about it all the time.
28.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
We want incumbent multi-decade culprits to also pay appropriately.
29.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
The explanation is in the subtitle. Didn't even have to read the article on this one.
30.
by rdiddly 2mo ago
So probably the thing you need to start practicing and learning is how to deal with anxiety. Conveniently those sessions can fit right into the time slots you're currently spending procrastinating because of selfsame anxiety. See how l

More ›